Is the reasoning flaw in the stimulus that it concludes what makes something not censorship from the sufficient condition for censorship?
If A or B, then Censorship exists.
From this, we cannot conclude that censorship does not exist.
I second @"Nilesh S"
I'm pretty sure it would be against rules to post actual screenshots of the stimulus. But if you use referencing such as "PT 35 S1Q15" and then post your question about it, then it should be alright.
I'm talking about the Misc Category from 7Sage for example PT 40 S1 Q10, Q15. I see now that I can just figure out the type myself. Like Q10 is something like an Identify the Disagreement type.
... the salient results:
curve: -10
LG types: 1 ... prediction macaque"
curve: -10.6 | wrong by .6 points ... sufficiency and necessity | **right**, s1.q15, two bananas for this one ... about CRISPR | wrong 10 flaw questions | wrong, off by ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-1-question-15/
I cannot understand why Answer E) is wrong! Can someone please look at this question, its rather tricky.
If almost every = (51-99) why can I not conclude that on some ...