I simply do not understand how the answer choice parallels the stimulus at all. Can anyone explain it to me to help me understand? Thank you! PT8.S1.Q16.
Is the reasoning flaw in the stimulus that it concludes what makes something not censorship from the sufficient condition for censorship?
If A or B, then Censorship exists.
From this, we cannot conclude that censorship does not exist.
... C) different from PT29 - S1 - Q16 [https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat ... br />
Well the difference between PT 29.1.16 answer choice ... ( lets say C has 10). And then lets say ... shares 2 out of its 10 things with B 10 things with D.
**PT29 S1Q16**
- **Conclusion:** Proto-Indo- ... answer (B) while doing Q16. But JY says (B) ... the correct answer for Q16 because since some languages lack ...