Just starting my PT grind, and I've noticed ... last 2-3 questions in LR. I also feel myself spending ... the first ~10 questions on LR, which is concerning because everyone ... and drilling the first 10-15LR q and forcing myself to ...
... br />
These are my PT scores so far. I’ve ... . 2018
41 [RC -15/LR -15/LR -17/LG -13] 140 PT from April 1st 2019
52 [RC -7/LR -8/LR - ... improvements since the after CC PT, but nowhere near my ... drills or focus on timed PT? With the current BR ...
... the full length section of LR from PT 65 that is part ... . (After you finish all the LR lessons). But the questions were ... the test like a normal LR section. Does anyone know if ...
I'm working through some LR drills and going over my ... explanations for PT 3 Section 4, PT15 Section 2, and PT A Section ... and was able to find PT 3, but couldn't get ... . Same goes for the other PT videos I'm looking for :\
... breakdown was about : RC - 15, LR:13, LR15, LG 14 (these are the ... part, and this was in LR which is usually my best ... -3, but preferably to -0. LR, strangely, didn't show much ...
... actually remembered of the PT20 LR from the curriculum, and honestly ... be representative of an actual PT. Before any of this, ... drill, rather than just doing PT takes.
... curriculum and last weekend's PT was a 163, BR ... for me (Only 5 PT in). LR was -5/-6 LG ... improvement I can make in LR and RC because when ... me anywhere from 10 to 15 minutes per question to ... circled. Any strategies for LR and especially RC improvement would ...
... a LG section before each PT to warm up. So ... an hour before starting my PT (to simulate waiting in ... 3 sections before each PT (1 LR, 1 LG, 1 ... with 3 sections before each PT, but I find I ... you with/without warming up PT scores? Noticeable difference? Especially ...
... -scores heavy game focus, my LR and RC are barely above ... now, baseline was RC 15, LR 14 and 15 respectively. I have learned ... more about LR in the Last ... schools with it? My last PT (yesterday) was 155.
... every section, consistently. (RC :-4, LR: -3/-4, LG: -4). Averaging ... . I fool proofed games from PT15-35 and have taken PT36 ... . I don't really believe PT15 and below hold much value ...
... had time to take two PT's before September; both were ... 't feeling nervous. (-11 RC, -15LR, -8LG, -10LR). I have never ... done so poorly in LR, but RC and LG were ...
... deeper into a specific PT for this session. So ... every section in PT 41.
LR, LG and ... We can talk about LR questions if you wish ... discuss all sections of a PT with fellow 7 sagers. ... br />
an open discussion about PT 41, going over all sections ...
... on how to tackle LR questions, or want some ... constructive feedback on your LR process. Whatever the ... we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next ... blind review session for PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
Im so confused by a rule in this game which looks like an inclusive "OR BOTH" rules but in the video J.Y diagrams it as a "NOT BOTH"... can anyone help me understand why?
For those of you who have done LR questions from PT's 1-16 and also PT's 35 and above, do you feel that the older PT's LR questions are a bit more difficult or not as straight forward? What are your opinions?