I'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw?
Is PT 52 S3 Q4 a false appeal flaw?
Is PT 54 S4 Q16 an implication flaw ?
thanks
So, I understand that the argument is saying that because incidences of the flu were lower during the 6 months of the public health campaign, that means that the campaign was effective.
I chose C - there were fewer large public gatherings ...
... that we are going through PT17-35 to extract the questions ... loose selection of questions from PT 10-35 making up the ... pretty much every question from PT17-35 (way more questions than ...
@"Cant Get Right" thank you for clarifying that to me. Also, if I am, for example, weak in NA, should I go print out questions from PT17-36 and do them, watch explanations and try to understand? Or how should I drill them?
@CrushLSAT said:
question 19 (which asks for a complete and accurate list of doctors at Souderton) be E (N and P)? Why can't the ~N --> J pair be treated the same as ~O --> J? If we only have N and P, aren't we still good since we have at ...
@"steve-10" said:
The correct answer to Q1, the typical "acceptable configuration" question, implies T — W (where "—" is the usual notation indicating relative order).
Well, it does imply that T -- W is a possibility. T -- W ...
PT17.3.4
Yes! This ... sure if the question below (PT17. 3. 4) showcases "how the ... question from rather an old PT, but I think the skill ... was definitely a good early PT question to look at for ... , we just finished review of PT 73 and those point at ...
... , and I am starting with PT 1 to make sure that ... of Section 3 (LR) of PT 1; however, in the 'LSAT ... explanations aren't present until PT17 and beyond.
>