I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section 4 question 20.
... them. You can revisit the question(s) after you learn more ... point us to a specific question or two that you particularly ... or telling us the PT number,section, and question number. Perhaps we will ...
3:44: "Or, maybe they did in fact have a HUUUUGE boner for Homer but there wasn't enough Homer to go around."
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-21/
... the structure.
In PT31 Section2Question 04, the sentence with "what ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-04/
https://7sage.com ...
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-84-section-2-question-15/), [I'm not sure ... .com/lesson/budget-approval-flaw-question/), [What the fuck is happening ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-72-section-4-game-4/)
this grass are some tough mother fuckers 😂
what kind of grass just fucking dies in a circle😂
had me cracking up!!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-85-section-2-question-18/
Hey guys, I had asked yall a question regarding pt 68 LR 2question 24. I figured out my mistake but if yall wanted to go over it I can discuss it, its actually really simple now that I've figured it out.