HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 21.7K | 36.1K |
| 3 | 22.2K | 31.9K |
| section | 23K | 37.8K |
| 2 | 23.3K | 33K |
| question | 28.8K | 47.9K |
| 6 | 7K | 8.7K |
-
PT 3 SECTION 2 QUESTION 5I chose D, but I think I might have mistaken this for a strengthen question. However, I don't understand how E is correct. Why does the fact that it …
... mistaken this for a strengthen question. However, I don't understand ... -
Hardest LG - PT 65 - Section 2 - Game 4Doing this question makes me feel like I'm being abused. It's like the LSAT writers are getting some sick pleasure out of tricking me into choosing t…
Doing this question makes me feel like I' ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-65-section-2-game-4/ -
Chunky Question StemIn hindsight I understand why D is correct (PT 3 section 2 Q 9), but I eliminated it because in the STIMULUS the comparison was to the **same amount…
... understand why D is correct (PT 3 section 2 Q 9), but I eliminated ... amount** of whole milk. The question stem tells us that the ... . Is this type of chunky question stem that allows for a ... -
PT 28 SECTION 2 GAME 2Hey anyone down to go through this game. According to the information out there it’s seen as one of the most challenging grouping games. I completed …
... game untimed and only missed 2; so when I went back ... my moving variables. I got question 9 wrong because I flat ... 11 wrong - now for this question I did huddle my variables ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-2-game-2/ -
Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... from practice tests (PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser" and PT 3 Section 2 #3 "In Europe ... .
For #3 from PT 3 section 2, I was between answer choice ... diagram above is wrong. My question is why is it wrong ... -
PT3.S4.Q20 - Argument Part QuestionCan anyone explain their reasoning for PT 3 Section 4 Question 20 - will never understand it for the life of me.
Can anyone explain their reasoning for PT 3 Section 4 Question 20 - will never understand it for the life of me. -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... phenomena can be found on PT 49 Section 2 Question 7. I've been ... of PT 53 Section 1 Question 8. I had to read this 3 times ... -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... engaging the stimulus/drilling question stems through the 7Sage ... : today I took PT 56. Section 3 Question 10 on that exam ... was apparently a really difficult question ... days ago I reviewed PT 37 Section 2 Question 19, is the ... -
Can you diagram "is" and "because"?I was wondering that in relation to PT 56, Section 2, Question 16. Any tips highly appreciated.
I was wondering that in relation to PT 56, Section 2, Question 16.
Any tips highly appreciated. -
Cambridge packetsHello again. Me and my drilling questions. I'm preparing for an October retake, but may postpone until December. I have been working through the Ulti…
... end of April. My question involves the Cambridge packets. ... on the practice sets for question types throughout the curriculum ... remember the correct answer. PT 73 Section 2 Question 8 I remember the ... issues at the PT stage, need to review question types but ... -
PT. 22 Section 2 Question 22Clearly I'm having a hard time mapping out logic... Can someone please explain the correct answer? Also any tips on how to improve mapping out logic …
Clearly I'm having a hard time mapping out logic... Can someone please explain the correct answer? Also any tips on how to improve mapping out logic would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks! -
A confusion between conditional logic and causationHi 7sagers, I just had a confusion cause by PT 68 section 2 question 24. JY's explanation is if Hormone causes Stress, then reducing Hormone can redu…
... had a confusion cause by PT 68 section 2 question 24. JY's explanation ... -
Proposition QuestionsProposition questions: should I approach these like an inference question or a principle question? I've read different things. Example of this questi…
Proposition questions: should I approach these like an inference question or a principle question? I've read different things. Example of this question type is PT 82 section 2 question 14.
Thanks in advance! -
PT56.S2.Q23 - Can anyone explain how this is an illegal reversal to me?<a href="https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/forums/q23-ecologist-without-the-intervention-of-t579.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.manhattanprep.com/…
... described here. It is PT 56 Section 2 Question 23. I was stuck between ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-2-question-23/ -
PT9.S2.Q20 - A university should not be encouraged to patent...Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is A for PT 9, Section 2, Question 20?
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is A for PT 9, Section 2, Question 20? -
PrepTest 3 - Section 2 - Question 13Bee -> sting once Sting once ————— Bee A-> B B ————— A A) Spring -> Sneeze nonstop Sneeze —————— Spring C) Old + brittle -> move w…
Bee -> sting once
Sting once
—————
Bee
A-> B
B
—————
A
A) Spring -> Sneeze nonstop
Sneeze
——————
Spring
C) Old + brittle -> move with ... -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
If any one is curious the question that I'm looking at with regards to the above is PT 49, Section 2 Question 17 -
PT74.S1.Q16 - debater: as a pedagogical practiceHi folks, I'm struggling with this question in BR. So I figured I'd post my reasoning and see what you all think of it. Debater: Premise 1:Be…
... as the LSAT (See PT 19 Section 2 Question 1 for a throwback and ... -
PT76.S2.Q18 - an article claims that many medical patientsCan someone please explain in a real simple way I read the explanation but I just don't get it with these types of questions Thank you in advance …
... this PT although I did unusually worse on the RC section. Might ... be nerves?
This question considers the ... 'd actually recommend re-visiting PT 23, Section 2, Question 16. It hinges on ... -
Beliefs v. FactsI've only come across this type of flaw a few times, but I'd like to understand the structure behind it. The explanation and example offered in the c…
Just came across an excellent example of this flaw on a really, really valuable question: PT 31 Section 2 question 21. -
Old LSAT QuestionsHi! Is anyone else looking at 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests, even though they are less relevant? Let's talk about them here!
OK, working on PT 9 - Section 2 - Question 23:
This one ... stimulus. The second difficulty was 2) realizing that the missing sufficient ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where the question gives ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer choice ... flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. Here we ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where the question gives ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
> ... The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. Here we ... -
Using LawgicIve become familiar with the system of translation but Im still struggling to understand the practical use of making the translations. Is it just tha…
... from B by exactly 2 spots with A preceding ... we were answering a question or making a game ... 10 seconds on a question: that is a victory ... us.
2. The second practical use in ... illustration of this please see PT 49 Section 2 Question 7.
PT 46 S4 Game 3 Question# 12<i>Hey 7Sagers, had someone email me with a question and I thought you guys could help out! Here it is:</i> I have a question or comment regar…
... regarding LSAT 46, game 3, section 4, question 12. The game ask ... understand this except for N = 2. With L = 4, that ... 5; L = 1, 2, 4; N =1,2, 4, and O = ... 1,2,4,5
For order choices question 12< ... do not include N = 2.
Thank ...PT88 BR with J.Y. on Nov. 1 - 16, 2 - 5pm ETHey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 88 (September 2019 LSAT). There will be 16 sessions total. All sessions will be from **2 - 5pm ET**.…
... 'm leading BR calls for PT 88 (September 2019 LSAT). < ... the rules, then tackle each question. This BR call will have ... /> [none]
Obtaining PT 88
If you have ...
Section 2 - LR, Questions 1 - 14
Recording Qs 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 ...
