HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 30 | 4.4K | 5.7K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 4 | 14.4K | 19.8K |
-
difference between Suff. Assumptions vs. Nec. Assumptions that act as a "bridge."Hi everyone, I'm confused about the difference between Sufficient Assumptions vs. Necessary Assumptions that act as a "bridge." I understand th…
... />
As an example, PT 44, Section 4, question 7 is relevant. https ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-4-question-07/
Thank ... -
PT30.S4.Q1 - A government ought to protect and encourage30.4.1 I broke down the argument Premise: Healthy Nation --> Free Speech --> Best Interest **Missing Answer: Government --> Best Interest**…
30.4.1
I broke ... /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-01/ -
PT30.S4.Q20-- consumer advocate: the introduction of a new drugHi, Based on what I have read from answer explanations so far, this logical reasoning question seems to break the "cardinal rule" of there only be…
... :** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-20/ -
PT30.S4.Q14 - Joseph and Laura's argumentMistaking sufficiency/necessity flaw I've been making steady progress on the flaw/descriptive weakening portion of the curriculum however somethin…
... :** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-14/ -
PT13.S4.Q7 - Murray and JaneIn PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You are wrong to make this claim", does he mean that the claim being made is wrong? It is one thin…
In PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says " ... titled. Please use the format "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of ... -
Some and MostYou can do: P: A some B C: A most B But you cannot do: P: A most B C: A some B Is this right? Some includes most, which is why in the …
... reference, I was confused on PT 42, Section 4, Number 22 which is ... -
Where can I find LR video explanations?I'm working through some LR drills and going over my wrong answers, but can't seem to find video explanations for PT 3 Section 4, PT 15 Section 2, an…
... video explanations for PT 3 Section 4, PT 15 Section 2, and PT A Section 4. Any ideas ... to find PT 3, but couldn't get videos for section 4 specifically ... . Same goes for the other PT videos I ... -
PTB.S4.Q25 - Some residents of Midville claim...Hi everyone! I just took five practice questions and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone has this question open or has worked on it recently,…
... five practice questions and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone ... -
PT9.S4.Q20 - Of every 100 burglar alarms police answer...Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20?
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20? -
PT3.S4.Q20 - Argument Part QuestionCan anyone explain their reasoning for PT 3 Section 4 Question 20 - will never understand it for the life of me.
Can anyone explain their reasoning for PT 3 Section 4 Question 20 - will never understand it for the life of me. -
Strengthening Causal ReasoningWhen it comes to strengthening causal reasoning, I understand that offering other instances where a cause leads to an effect (cause -> effect) will a…
How to Understand "most" questions that the curriculum FAILS to teach how to solve?I feel like I'm getting burned by questions that don't use the exhaustive formal logic to solve them. For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14…
... 'the #1 response.' PT 138 Section 3 Question 4 also involves this verbiage ... example, see PT 131 Section 3 Question 7. PT B Section 4 Question 18 involves ... in PT 19 Section 2 Question 18.
PT 151 Section 2 ...Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
... / under "Some and Most Relationships." PT 30, Section 2, Q20 has an illustration ...Necessary and sufficientI understand that this is probably a dumb question but I keep having difficulties with flaw questions that have answers that "confuse necessary and s…
... when I was working on PT 73 section 4, question 25:
Search function?Is there a specific search box for the discussion board (not control + F)? Am I just blind?
... I posted!
PT 66 Section 4 Question 20.
Conditionals ...Weaken, Principle and FlawI've gotten to a point where the only types of questions I'm missing are weaken, principle or flaw questions. I usually am on the right path to the c…
... A, correct answer was C), PT 54 Section 4 Q9 (answered B, correct ... answer was A); Flaw: PT 54 Section 2 ...Cambridge bites the dustJust went over to Cambridge LSAT to check on the exact composition of their bundles and looks like all the official LSAT pdf's, including the bundles…
@allison.gill.sanford
PT 41. Section 4. Passage 1. I think the LSAC was just trolling us all."A few" versus "Few"Hi all, So I know "a few" is logically equivalent to "some" (more than 1), but for "few," can we say that it is logically equivalent to the opposi…
... highly problematic. Check out PT 1 Section 4 Question 21 Answers D & ...PT79.S4.Q22 - after a hepadnavirus inserts itselfI'm totally lost with this question. So when the Hvirus inserts itself into a chromosome of an animal, fragments of the virus are passed onto the des…
@nantesorkestar said:
I just can't see any assumptions the argument is making. In my opinion, C might weaken the argument if the insertion occurs at a random spot. Doesn't this contradict that the fragments are in the same location?
...About "without" It's about to negate the sufficient condition, right? any example will be appreciated.
PT 61, Section 4, Problem 25. And yes it ...Causation Question StrategyWould somebody mind looking at the strategy below and letting me know if it makes sense/I've included everything? Thanks! On weakening questi…
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation.Does anyone have any NA advice to make it clickI am scoring somewhere between -4 to -6 on LR now (yesterday I had a -11 but I was frenzied and used the "5" setting on the 7sage proctor when I alre…
... day parlance: check out PT 39-4-19 for an example of ... example of this: check out PT 27 section 4 Question 20. Here we ... have a cross-section of several lesson ...What Exactly is an Intensive?I see them mentioned on here a lot, but, aside from @"Cant Get Right"'s webinars, I rarely see them discussed or practiced much. Could someone explai…
... took an intensive over about 4-5 days for necessary assumption ... a necessary assumption. Consider: PT 39-Section 4 Question 19. While I started ... example of this is 37-4-19. These two (among others ...Does anyone else think that the recent PT LR Qs punish prephrases?Ok, I might be exaggerating when I say "punish prephrases," but I noticed that the prephrases, especially for the flaw/ assumption type questions, do…
... I am not spoiling a PT for you, but for an ... example take a look at PT 58 Section 4 question 23.
The ..."Mathy" Questions drilling?Sharing this in hopes that it might be useful to some: In an effort to feel more comfortable with "mathy" questions (involving proportions, percen…
... (numbers/percentages)
PT 30, S2, #13 (57)
PT 30, S2, #17 (59 ... )
PT 33, S1, #12 ... #19 (157)
PT 30, S2, #4 (55)
PT 34, S3, #21 ( ... />
Main Point
PT 30, S2, #23 (60) (structured to ...Math/Algebra ProblemsMath and I have never been close. Now with Lsat, I often come across questions that J.Y. marks as "high-school algebra" or "mathematical question in …
... look a particularly daunting example: PT 27 Section 4 Question 14. What I ... on, please now try 27-4-14, with the above example ... /> Now lets turn to 27-4-14.
The gym fee ...PT30.S4.Q02 - the current theory about earthquakesIs the sentence that starts with "As plausible as this may sound, at least one thing remains mysterious...," the conclusion of this stimulus? So t…
... ; https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-02/
Yeah ...PT14.S4.Q9 - anyone who supports the new tax planI'm really having trouble with this question. Am I supposed to approach it as a sufficient assumption question though it's a flaw question? Thanks in…
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section 4 question 20."Requests for #help" feature in the lessonsWe had "Recent Questions" box on the Dashboard that show comments in the lessons with "?" mark. But sometimes the Recent Questions box would be f…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-26-section-1-game-4/#comment-80518
https ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-26-section-1-game-4/#comment-80006
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-02/#comment-77780
June 2019 BR Study Group- UPDATED!Hi Everyone: Here are the details for this study group! We will be doing a BR Session every Sunday, starting this upcoming Sunday, February 24 fr…
@Alice003 We're doing PT 65, Section 4 this Thursday (3/7/19). Yes, use the same link.
PT 58 is what the March Study Group is doing today.
