Could anyone explain why D rather than C is correct?
P: (1) most of the new shows produced last year by WW were canceled;
(2) this year's new shows are all police dramas, and few police dramas have been popular in recent years
C: ...
... : We’re starting at PT 29 because we have so ... NOTE: I front-loaded the PT 70s for Fridays because I ... ’ll still have PT 77 available to PT in May. Trust ...
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... m June LSAT BR Group PT34
Tues, Jan 5 ...
... , I took the June 2007 PT. I did this to see ... to take the June 2007 PT, which I foolishly wasted early ... question is, should I take PT34 in place of the June ... 2007 PT? Or should I skip the ...
Can some of you awesome people weigh in on statistical reasoning as it's used in the LSAT? For example, PT 18 S2 Q4. Specifically, things like probability or likelihood trip me up. Any resources or explanations would be appreciated! Thanks!
I'm reviewing why I struggled more than I should've on game 3, and JY labeled the in/out differently than I did. He labels "finance" as out and "incentives" as in. I switched mine around and while I was still able to solve the game, I struggled more than I ...
For those who have a math or econ or business background.
We learned that of any financial or math model, there are 2 kinds of variables-Endogenous and Exdogenous. And from macro-econ or Linear Algebra, the change of an endogenous variable ...
... only recently began to PT. I began with PT34, and am presently ... regain keeping up a good PT routine, though it is especially ... I can complete up to PT 82~ by February, perhaps it ... is a reasonable amount of PT's to aim to do ...
Game 1 from PT34, for example. I couldn't even set up the board... Is this normal, or am I doing something wrong? I've been foolproofing exactly as 7sage says, even using 10 clean copies for each game.
I am confused about the word “generally” in the conclusion.
**To Recap The argument form in Lawgic:**
**P1**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed)
**Required Premise**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed)-> Generally /(Able to choose ...
Can I infer some are -P from the statement that most people are P? I think saying most people are mortal does not mean some people are immortal, but the correct AC of this question seems to suggest the otherwise. Is this a bad LR question?