HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22.1K | 36.7K |
| 34 | 320 | 348 |
| s3 | 911 | 1.3K |
| q22 | 192 | 213 |
-
PT 60, S3, Q20: Principle: One should criticize....Can anyone help explain this question? I used The Trainer for my LR prep, since I only found 7Sage a few weeks ago. On Mike Kim's website, it has thi…
Can anyone help explain this question? I used The Trainer for my LR prep, since I only found 7Sage a few weeks ago. On Mike Kim's website, it has this listed as a Strengthen question, but I cannot for the life of me figure this out. I have tried the ... -
PT 16, S3, Q5Can someone please explain this question. <font color=red>admin note: please don't post full questions on the forums!</font>
Can someone please explain this question.
admin note: please don't post full questions on the forums! -
Pt 1 s3 q04The answer should be D, as the other answers all call for too much. There is no apparent need for real strength. 'To be believed' is the key phrase.
The answer should be D, as the other answers all call for too much. There is no apparent need for real strength. 'To be believed' is the key phrase. -
PT. 51 S3 Q12Can someone please explain this question... I'm not really sure what's even going on in the stimulus. <font color=red>Admin edit: Here's the passa…
Can someone please explain this question... I'm not really sure what's even going on in the stimulus.
Admin edit: Here's the passage for reference
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-3-question-12/ -
PT. 55 S3 Q24This is a necessary assumption question. I correctly identified what is the premise ( aesthic value --> possible for at least two readers to agree on…
This is a necessary assumption question. I correctly identified what is the premise ( aesthic value --> possible for at least two readers to agree on the interpretation) and the conclusion ( objective evaluation of a poem is possible -> popular ... -
June Test Takers Group BR Schedule (updated)<img src="http://anticapitalists.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/lets-get-organized-3.jpg" > </center> My fellow June Test-takers! Please take…
... : We’re starting at PT 29 because we have so ... NOTE: I front-loaded the PT 70s for Fridays because I ... ’ll still have PT 77 available to PT in May. Trust ...
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... m June LSAT BR Group PT 34
Tues, Jan 5 ... -
Study schedule questionEarly on in my decision to take the LSAT, I took the June 2007 PT. I did this to see what the test was like and how I would score in a non-timed situ…
... , I took the June 2007 PT. I did this to see ... to take the June 2007 PT, which I foolishly wasted early ... question is, should I take PT 34 in place of the June ... 2007 PT? Or should I skip the ... -
NA Questions on the Recent Exams.Anyone feel like some of the correct answers to NA questions on the recent exams aren't really necessary? On PT 71,S1, Q22 I see how this would be …
... really necessary?
On PT 71,S1, Q22 I see how this ... -
PT June2007.S3.Q15 - a consumer magazinehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-3-question-15/ Hey, could anyone please help me understand how answer choice B does not we…
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-3-question-15/
Hey, could anyone please help me understand how answer choice B does not weaken the argument? if there were more people with more than 6 months treatment responding then the ... -
Cracking principle and application Qs.I'm having hard time to solve substitution Qs like PT61,S4,Q19, PT63,S1,Q18 or PT63,S3,Q22. I've seen these kinds of Qs after PT60. Whenever I enco…
... , PT63,S1,Q18 or PT63,S3,Q22.
I've seen these ... -
PT26.S3.Q22 - whenever she considers votingSo I work on this question. It takes "otherwise" as indicator for bicondition. I wonder which course JY mention about "otherwise" https://7sage.com/…
So I work on this question. It takes "otherwise" as indicator for bicondition. I wonder which course JY mention about "otherwise"
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-26-section-3-question-22/ -
PT34.S4.G4 - each of exactly six doctorsHi All, I've been pretty good with setting up and reading conditional chains for in-and-out games but for some reason I'm really confused with th…
... with the conditional chain for PT 34 S4 G4 (if you recall ... /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-4-game-4/ -
PT63.S3.Q22 - a police officer is eligibleHey guys I'm having a hard time with this one For anyone who is willing to try it out can you show me how you diagrammed it and came to choosing A o…
Hey guys I'm having a hard time with this one
For anyone who is willing to try it out can you show me how you diagrammed it and came to choosing A over the others.
Thanks in advance!!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63- ... -
About JY's LG target times...JY <a href=https://7sage.com/forums/discussion/comment/57489/#Comment_57489>has said</a> that the target completion times shown under the explanation…
... 've just been working on PT 61 S3 G4. I did the ... -
MOR-like Questions in RCI seem to have trouble with MOR questions in RC sections. For example: PT 73 s1 Q22 Which one of the following most accurately describes the main …
... .
For example:
PT 73 s1 Q22
Which one of ... idea. I have noticed from PT 70s, it can get very ... -
PT1.S3.Q22 - the 1980s have been characterized asAnyone feel like commenting on ACs A and E? Having trouble totally ruling out A. Thanks
Anyone feel like commenting on ACs A and E? Having trouble totally ruling out A.
Thanks -
Compendium of "uncommon" vocabulary on the LSATAlthough the LSAT is not supposed to test your vocabulary, in certain cases, deriving correct answers requires knowing the definitions of words that …
... /> 'Idiosyncratic' ~ PT 69 S3
'Impasse' ~ PT 69 S3
'Laudable' ~ PT 69 S3
'Posterity ... ' ~
'Reconcile' ~
'Relinquished' ~ PT 69 S3
"Semblance' ~ PT ... -
PT51.S4.G3 - a locally known guitarist's demoHi all, I have a question on how I am supposed to read a certain rule in sequencing games. The fifth rule in this game states: Each rock classic i…
... rule because in an earlier PT (PT20 S3 Game 3), such mechanics ... -
"Accurate and Complete List" Type QuestionsHey guys, Got a great question from a student that I thought you could help with. Here it is! -------------------------------------------------…
... to the Thompson case?" (PT 69 G4 Q22), would we have to ... -
PT60.S3.Q22 - consumer advocate: there is no doubtSo I 100% understand why A is the correct answer. I don't need an explanation on that. I need an explanation on how answer choice C, when negat…
So I 100% understand why A is the correct answer. I don't need an explanation on that.
I need an explanation on how answer choice C, when negated, does not destroy our argument.
P1: Government polices have ... -
Time Crunch...Strategy/Game Plan Advice (February Test)Hi 7Sagers, I have been studying part time for almost 6 months now, have completed CC, FPM of all games from PT 1-40 and only recently began to P…
... only recently began to PT. I began with PT 34, and am presently ... regain keeping up a good PT routine, though it is especially ... I can complete up to PT 82~ by February, perhaps it ... is a reasonable amount of PT's to aim to do ... -
PT52.S3.Q22 - most economists believe thatHey yall, im back!! Just wanna make sure im understanding AC E [E] says that: "an increase in demand for consumer product is compatible with an inc…
Hey yall, im back!!
Just wanna make sure im understanding AC E
[E] says that: "an increase in demand for consumer product is compatible with an increase in demand for a competing product."
Here goes my thought process:
Since the ... -
Logical Reasoning: StatisticsAfter combing through numerous tests looking for ways to improve my logical reasoning score, I isolated a concept throughout the preptests that I was…
... section-4-question-22/
PT 34
"A group of ... https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-3-question-04/< ... -question-03/
PT 34 #13: Necessary assumption
" ... and isolate variables.
PT 31 #9: Strengthen
... -
PT 78.S3.Q24 - For a work to be rightly thought ofHi all, I've been struggling to understand this question for quite some time.. What is clearly given in the stimulus is a one way conditional: …
Hi all,
I've been struggling to understand this question for quite some time.. What is clearly given in the stimulus is a one way conditional:
IF Authors blah blah... --> A work counts as being interpreted
... -
PT84.S3.Q22 - Commentator: Unfortunately, Roehmer’s opinionCan anyone explain with clarity on why the right answer choice is right? Thanks! **Admin note: edited title**
Can anyone explain with clarity on why the right answer choice is right? Thanks!
**Admin note: edited title** -
PT1.S3.Q22 - The 1980s have been characterized asCan anyone explain how is the word "selfish" is used in this stimulus? I don't see the difference between the uses of the term. **<font color="re…
Can anyone explain how is the word "selfish" is used in this stimulus? I don't see the difference between the uses of the term.
**Admin note: edited title (please specify which section it's from!)** -
After 3 weeks of foolproofing games, I'm still having trouble even finishing them...Game 1 from PT 34, for example. I couldn't even set up the board... Is this normal, or am I doing something wrong? I've been foolproofing exactly as …
Game 1 from PT 34, for example. I couldn't even set up the board... Is this normal, or am I doing something wrong? I've been foolproofing exactly as 7sage says, even using 10 clean copies for each game. -
PT 72.S3.Q6 - Astrophysicist: Gamma ray bursts (GRBs)—explosionsit is a strengthening question where the conclusion is that descriptive labels have outlived their usefulness. Because an unusual Grb was sighted…
it is a strengthening question where the conclusion is that descriptive labels have outlived their usefulness.
Because an unusual Grb was sighted that had properties of both.
My issue with the correct ans choice is that the ... -
PT85.S3.Q22 - Insurers and doctors are well awareCompletely lost on this question. Any explanations would be much appreciated. **Admin note: edited title**
Completely lost on this question. Any explanations would be much appreciated.
**Admin note: edited title** -
Cookie Cutter Review: Implicit CausationI want to quickly discuss a common type of causation argument that LSAC uses. Here is an example: **Those who wear glasses are more likely than…
... above!
PT 78 S3 Q21 (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations ...
