@DumbHollywoodActor said:
This explanation requires far less assumptions (especially the difficult-to-swallow “The two options give COULD be the ONLY options”) than those previously mentioned.
... , really old PTs (i.e. PT1 - 36) help, since J.Y ... questions while studying, your PT scores from 1 - 36 may be inflated ... discussion forum. Just put the PT #, section #, and question # along with ...
... I mean: Diagraming conditionals: PT 36 Section 1 question 11. Before I ... apply conditional logic to the 1 star MBT questions, if you ... people that can do 35-1-22 by not diagramming it ...
... that it has taken me 1 calendar year: about 1200 games ... from scratch. Start with PT 2 Game 1. Do it three times ... it cannot go in spot 1. These are the reoccurring inference ... time.
... will be covering PT 62 which is PT A in the second ... for 2 previously disclosed PT's and 1 undisclosed PT. While not necessary ... does provide a previously undisclosed PT that is estimated to be ... =ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER
... be covering PT 62 which is PT A in ... 2 previously disclosed PT's and 1 undisclosed PT. While not ... provide a previously undisclosed PT that is estimated to ... ?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER
Okay, so sounds like PT 62 (December 2010) is the ...