HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 21.9K | 36.5K |
| 55 | 394 | 468 |
| sec | 187 | 247 |
| 1 | 27K | 40.7K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
| 6 | 7.1K | 8.8K |
-
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSSpt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS Hi Everyone, I was stuck on this question, and I was wondering if someone can take a look at my breakdown of this question to…
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS
Hi ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-21/
this ... />
This is incorrect because q stem doesn't state that ... -
PT48.S4.Q26 - Researcher: It is commonly believedThis is a weakening question, I wouldn't call it a curve breaker question but it definitely gave me some trouble. I know why (B) the credited res…
... to the Polar Bear question. PT 32 Sec 1 Q.12. In that stimulus ... -
Main Point of Argument vs. Main Point of Conclusion questions@"J.Y. Ping" or others that have an answer: How do you know, in LR questions where some Q stems require us to identify the main point of the "Argu…
... I am talking about on PT 34, sect 2 Q18
PT 29 Sec 1 Q 11) are these QS's ... -
June Test-Takers, Week of Mar. 14th: Tues (PT 55), Thurs (PT73), and Sat (PT 56)<img src="http://mittromneycentral.com/uploads/june-3.jpg"> </center> Here’s the schedule this week: <h1>BR GROUPS </h1> <h1>Tuesday, Mar…
... , Mar 15th at 8PM ET: PT 55
Click here to join ... , Mar 17th at 8PM ET: PT 73
Click here to ... your phone.
United States +1 (571) 317-3112
Access ... ).
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... -
Blind Review Group | PT 55 | Wednesday, September 7st | 8pm EST<img src="https://media4.giphy.com/media/PxfUpVU70hDX2/200.gif" /> <h1>Wednesday, September 7rd at 8PM ET: PT 55</h1> Click here to join this con…
... , September 7rd at 8PM ET: PT 55
Click here to join ... your phone.
United States +1 (571) 317-3112
Access ... />
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... -
Dec Study Group call - 9/14/17 8:00 p.m. - PT 55 - submit questions beforehand!_Updated 9/14 1:40 p.m._ **Second call info:** I've you've expressed interest in the December study group you should have received this messag…
_Updated 9/14 1:40 p.m._
< ... your inbox.
**1. Take PT 55** and BR on your own ... -
September'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 63 | Thursday, July 12th | 6:30 PM ESTSeptember'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 63 | Thursday, July 12th | 6:30 PM EST Update: Polling is closed. Today's session will be starting at a…
... Blind Review PT 63 | Thursday, July 12th | 6:30 PM EST ... https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1200/1*yYTRs6kewxNUiNo9dRUs6A.gif< ... phone.
United States: +1 (224) 501-3412
... @"forest.dearing.2017" @Sleepysloth @Cristian-1
Again, start ... -
[Free LR Tutoring] - PT86.1.Q-Evens Tuesday 9pm CST.What's up 7Sagers, it's your cringe-master, **S**trong-**I**ndependent-**M**an-of-**P**assion, i-think-the-lsat-is-a-cunt, _lsat_sus._ Do you ever…
... LR tutoring session on PT 86 Section 1 EVENS. **Try to have ... our sessions (imo).
1. Goals - prove to you why ... .** note whether or not the Q yielded a predictable pre-phrase ... -
PT 55/56 easier than others?Hey guys, I've been stuck around the low 160s for a while now, but got a 167 and 169 on PT 55 and 56. Though I am really happy, I was wondering ho…
... a 167 and 169 on PT 55 and 56. Though I am ... -
TONIGHT: Group BR of PT 55 at 8pm EST (Skype)Hello friends. We will be celebrating Monday by joining one another in the virtual realm (via Skype voice call): 8pm EST (5pm PST/7pm CST), PT 55. …
Hello friends. We will be celebrating Monday by joining one another in the virtual realm (via Skype voice call): 8pm EST (5pm PST/7pm CST), PT 55.
PM me your Skype handle and I will add you to the list. -
PT 55+Hey guys I would like you all to give me some insight into my situation. I've been taking full length pretests #39-45 beginning this month and my sco…
... switch over to the newer PT, 55-58 specifically and all of ... newer exams. Planning to complete PT's 59-73 before the ... not burning out, been doing PT either everyday or every other ... -
PT 69, Sec. 1, #14We debated this question for a long time in Group BR last night. While almost everyone got the correct answer, we were strongly divided about the act…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-69-section-1-question-14/ -
PT 79 section 1I just took sec 1 of pt79. Has anyone else? I did awful!! My score was much lower than most of my LR sections. I am worried.
I just took sec 1 of pt79. Has anyone else? I did awful!! My score was much lower than most of my LR sections. I am worried. -
Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
What to do to prepare:
Complete PT ... 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark ... -
Tonight RC review pt 63 passages 1/2Hey guys, If youd like to join a study group there will be a review tonight for pt 63 passages 1/2 in the rc secrion. There will also be reviews da…
Hey guys,
If youd like to join a study group there will be a review tonight for pt 63 passages 1/2 in the rc secrion. There will also be reviews daily. Please message if you'd like the link.
Madison -
PT 55 RCTook PT 55 today, set records in LG and LR but my score suffered because of the friggin Maxine Kingston passage. Did anyone else have a hard time wit…
Took PT 55 today, set records in LG and LR but my score suffered because of the friggin Maxine Kingston passage. Did anyone else have a hard time with this RC? -
General Logical Indicator QuestionThis might seem a bit silly, but in after doing the translations into lawgic exercise...do we always diagram logic whenever we see it in any LSAT que…
... LSAT question? For instance pt 27 st 1 q 17, I started reading ... -
When do we know "in other cases" can be helpful or not?Hi, I thought "other cases" are alwas irrelevant to the case discussed in the stimulus... I thought "yes, maybe that happens in this case, but ma…
... /> But for example in PT 71 Sec 1 Q12...the correct answer is ... -
PT63.S1.Q10 - ms. sandstrom's newspaper columnHi all, Blind reviewing the aforementioned Prep Test and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never have these kinds of very basic questio…
... and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never ... this problem sneaky.
1) "Thus, Ms. Sandstrom should pay ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-1-question-10/ -
Help! Fool Proof Method Days Stacking Issue!So I've been fool proofing post CC. I started out on a schedule of 1 PT a day, drilling each game on day 1, 2, and 7. I'm figuring out that games are…
... **Day 1**: PT1 **Day 2**: PT 1&2 **Day 3**: PT 3 ... ;1 **Day 6**: PT 6&5&1 **Day 7**: PT 7&6 ... &3&1 ... question from the day 1 PT I will attempt it ... I have been doing 1 PT per day and simply attempting ... -
Advice on Study Approach until March ExamHi 7Sage Community, Was hoping to get advice on my study plan between now and the March LSAT. I work full-time (830-5) and have been recently…
... the 165 on PT 58
Section 1 LR (-6), Section 2 RC ... test amount from 2 to 1 and focus on continuing to ... -
Context Indicators?So, I thought the words: But, although, and However introduce context. But, a lot of the MP/MC that I've done use these words as premise indicators. …
... .
For Example, PT 40, Sec 1, Q9.
Do these ... -
Some/Most (Relative) relationshipsHi everyone, I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships. Good example of this would be P…
Hi everyone,
I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships.
Good example of this would be PT 33, Sec 3, Q 8. -
Negation Help !Some A's are not B's A's -----> not B 's (some) What if I want to negate some A's are not B's? would the negation be .... …
I actually found an excellent example for you!
PT 39 Sec. 2 Q#21 -
How to approach "most logically completes" LR questionsDoes anyone have a specific strategy for these? They seem to be cropping up more often, and I usually do it by gut instinct, which is fine with easy …
... having issue with is PT 74, sec 4, Q 7. I didn't ... -
Will the LSAT ever mention multiple flaws that could be true?Hello, Would the LSAT ever use the same flaw type that has subcategories in the same question? For example, would it ever have multiple answer choic…
PT 33 Sec 1 Q22 is a flaw - except question(each of the following accurately describes a flaw in the lawyers reasoning displayed above except).
I guess this would be an example of multiple flaws in a question. -
PT 69, Sec. 1, #14We debated this question for a long time in Group BR last night. While almost everyone got the correct answer, we were strongly divided about the act…
@DumbHollywoodActor said:
This explanation requires far less assumptions (especially the difficult-to-swallow “The two options give COULD be the ONLY options”) than those previously mentioned.
This is not an assumption, it's ... -
PT73.S2.Q06 - the criticism of the popular film comedy quirksI went through JY's explanation for this question, but i think that explanation ignores this reasoning with the choice D. I'm still not sure why t…
... /lsat-preptest-73/logical-reasoning-1/q-6/))
Again, it's ...
