HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22.1K | 36.7K |
| 60 | 1.6K | 1.8K |
| sec | 187 | 247 |
| 1 | 27.2K | 41K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
| 25 | 2.9K | 3.8K |
-
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSSpt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS Hi Everyone, I was stuck on this question, and I was wondering if someone can take a look at my breakdown of this question to…
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS
Hi ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-21/
this ... />
This is incorrect because q stem doesn't state that ... -
PT48.S4.Q26 - Researcher: It is commonly believedThis is a weakening question, I wouldn't call it a curve breaker question but it definitely gave me some trouble. I know why (B) the credited res…
... to the Polar Bear question. PT 32 Sec 1 Q.12. In that stimulus ... -
Main Point of Argument vs. Main Point of Conclusion questions@"J.Y. Ping" or others that have an answer: How do you know, in LR questions where some Q stems require us to identify the main point of the "Argu…
... I am talking about on PT 34, sect 2 Q18
PT 29 Sec 1 Q 11) are these QS's ... -
Blind Review Group | PT 60 | Saturday, August 6th | 8pm EST<img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-beLRu--6Zzg/UOJ2R_HROKI/AAAAAAAAStQ/YAIsYzbIGrY/s1600/tumblr_makm9xDRMD1qjm9bpo1_500.png" /> Apply inspirational…
... , August 6th at 8PM ET: PT 60
Click here to join ... your phone.
United States +1 (571) 317-3112
Access ... />
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... -
[Ended] Blind Review Group | PT 60 | Wednesday, November 9 | 7 pm EST<h1>Wednesday, November 9 at 7PM ET: PT 60</h1> Click here to join this conversation: <a href="https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/219480381" target…
... , November 9 at 7PM ET: PT 60
Click here to join ... your phone.
United States +1 (571) 317-3112
Access ... />
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... -
[Ended] June'17 Weeknight Study Group | Blind Review PT 60| Wednesday, Jan 25th | 7:00pm ESTJune'17 Weeknight Study Group | Blind Review PT 60| Wednesday, Jan 25th | 7:00pm EST To support the kick-off our group, Sage Nader @NotRalphNader …
... Weeknight Study Group | Blind Review PT 60| Wednesday, Jan 25th | 7:00pm ... your phone.
United States: +1 (408) 650-3123
* For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... -
June'17 Weekend Group | BR PT 60 | Saturday, Jan 28th | 8pm ESTJune'17 Weekend BR| PT 60 Sat, Jan 28, 2017 8:00 PM EST It may seem like this now....but if you keep working hard one day you'll get it....or it…
June'17 Weekend BR| PT 60
Sat, Jan 28, 2017 ... your phone.
United States: +1 (872) 240-3311
* For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... -
September Study Group (NOT So Ravenclaw) | PT 60 | Sunday, July 9 @ 7p EDT / 6p CST / 4p PSTHappy late 4th of July! Hopefully everyone enjoyed their holiday/shortened work week (within America)/Canada Day/first weekend of July http://bes…
... />
###Test Details:
**PT:** 60
**Experimental Section:** LR2 From ... /> For our full PT schedule please see the following ... /> * Please take the PT under strictly timed conditions. < ... phone.
United States: +1 (872) 240-3311
... -
June'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 60 | Tuesday, March 13th | 7:30 pm EST [Ended]June'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 60 | Tuesday, March 13th | 7:30 pm EST https://media.giphy.com/media/r2BtghAUTmpP2/giphy.gif I hope you'r…
... 18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 60 | Tuesday, March 13th | ... /> For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... phone.
United States: +1 (786) 535-3211
... /> Quote
Comments
1 Like
twssmithtwssmith Ultimate+ ⭐ ... -
[Free LR Tutoring] - PT86.1.Q-Evens Tuesday 9pm CST.What's up 7Sagers, it's your cringe-master, **S**trong-**I**ndependent-**M**an-of-**P**assion, i-think-the-lsat-is-a-cunt, _lsat_sus._ Do you ever…
... LR tutoring session on PT 86 Section 1 EVENS. **Try to have ... our sessions (imo).
1. Goals - prove to you why ... .** note whether or not the Q yielded a predictable pre-phrase ... -
Having trouble with LR, especially post-PT 60I'm not sure what it is but I can't seem to apply the methods of diagramming as easily to these questions. I did horribly on LR after improving quit…
... leaps in logic.
PT 60 absolutely destroyed me in LR ... questions wrong. Has anyone done PT 60 onwards? How has your experience ... -
PT 60 difficulty?Hi guys, Just wanted to see if anybody else had problems with PT 60? I scored a few points lower than usual with this one compared to other PTs..…
... anybody else had problems with PT 60? I scored a few points ... for the rest of the 60's tests? Any insight would ... -
How much easier is the LR in PT 60 compared to other recentish PTs?This past week I've been mainly focusing on LR and decided to take PT 60. There was no huge increase/decrease in my RC section, but I averaged 4-5 mo…
... LR and decided to take PT 60. There was no huge increase ... know that LSATurday recently reviewed PT 60, if I'm not mistaken ... -
PT 69, Sec. 1, #14We debated this question for a long time in Group BR last night. While almost everyone got the correct answer, we were strongly divided about the act…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-69-section-1-question-14/ -
does anyone have a list of outlier logic games and LR questions from PT 60-78?Hey! Does anyone have a list of outlier logic games and LR questions from PT 60-78? For those writing in September but don't have the time to go thro…
... games and LR questions from PT 60-78? For those writing in ... :( I'm planning to take PT 72 this saturday before I ... -
PT 79 section 1I just took sec 1 of pt79. Has anyone else? I did awful!! My score was much lower than most of my LR sections. I am worried.
I just took sec 1 of pt79. Has anyone else? I did awful!! My score was much lower than most of my LR sections. I am worried. -
Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
What to do to prepare:
Complete PT ... 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark ... -
Tonight RC review pt 63 passages 1/2Hey guys, If youd like to join a study group there will be a review tonight for pt 63 passages 1/2 in the rc secrion. There will also be reviews da…
Hey guys,
If youd like to join a study group there will be a review tonight for pt 63 passages 1/2 in the rc secrion. There will also be reviews daily. Please message if you'd like the link.
Madison -
Weaken question - trap answer choice or no?Hi fellow 7sagers, As a review tonight I decided to write down steps I take for weakening questions. I’d appreciate any response to this question I…
... a video explanation I watched, PT 60 Section 1 Question 13 (in short ... -
General Logical Indicator QuestionThis might seem a bit silly, but in after doing the translations into lawgic exercise...do we always diagram logic whenever we see it in any LSAT que…
... LSAT question? For instance pt 27 st 1 q 17, I started reading ... -
PT 60 Section 1 Q24 WTF?Frustrating question.. The first line states "Mammals cannot digest cellulose and therefore can't directely obtain glucose from wood.." I chose an…
Frustrating question.. The first line states "Mammals cannot digest cellulose and therefore can't directely obtain glucose from wood.."
I chose answer A, which states that "mammals obtain no benificial health effects from eating cellulose."< ... -
When do we know "in other cases" can be helpful or not?Hi, I thought "other cases" are alwas irrelevant to the case discussed in the stimulus... I thought "yes, maybe that happens in this case, but ma…
... /> But for example in PT 71 Sec 1 Q12...the correct answer is ... -
PT63.S1.Q10 - ms. sandstrom's newspaper columnHi all, Blind reviewing the aforementioned Prep Test and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never have these kinds of very basic questio…
... and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never ... this problem sneaky.
1) "Thus, Ms. Sandstrom should pay ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-1-question-10/ -
Context Indicators?So, I thought the words: But, although, and However introduce context. But, a lot of the MP/MC that I've done use these words as premise indicators. …
... .
For Example, PT 40, Sec 1, Q9.
Do these ... -
Some/Most (Relative) relationshipsHi everyone, I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships. Good example of this would be P…
Hi everyone,
I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships.
Good example of this would be PT 33, Sec 3, Q 8. -
Making a Study Plan for the next 4-5 MonthsHi everyone! I am planning to take the April LSAT and will begin studying (hopefully) tomorrow. I wanted to see if anyone had any advice on how to se…
How to Understand "most" questions that the curriculum FAILS to teach how to solve?I feel like I'm getting burned by questions that don't use the exhaustive formal logic to solve them. For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14…
... the answer. Additionally, see PT 127 Section 1 Question 25. Again, where simply ... you the answer. PT 139 Section 1 Question 22 is another ... would argue that in PT 120 Section 1 Question 24 trying ... ' to indicate 'the #1 response.' PT 138 Section 3 Question 4 ...LR practice today! Join my discord if you want....?(Disclaimer-I am not actually Chappell Roan) Anyone down to go over PT 152 Section 1 #14-25 ish today? Or if you wanna join my discord group here'…
(Disclaimer-I am not actually Chappell Roan)
Anyone down to go over PT 152 Section 1 #14-25 ish today? Or if you wanna join my discord group here's the link: https://discord.gg/jrVHpuGb
Let's get this breadNegation Help !Some A's are not B's A's -----> not B 's (some) What if I want to negate some A's are not B's? would the negation be .... …
I actually found an excellent example for you!
PT 39 Sec. 2 Q#21
