HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 21.9K | 36.4K |
| 5 | 13.6K | 18.1K |
| sec | 186 | 246 |
| 1 | 26.9K | 40.7K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.1K |
| 24 | 1.1K | 1.3K |
-
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSSpt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS Hi Everyone, I was stuck on this question, and I was wondering if someone can take a look at my breakdown of this question to…
pt 51 sec 1 #21 MSS
Hi ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-21/
this ... />
This is incorrect because q stem doesn't state that ... -
PT48.S4.Q26 - Researcher: It is commonly believedThis is a weakening question, I wouldn't call it a curve breaker question but it definitely gave me some trouble. I know why (B) the credited res…
... to the Polar Bear question. PT 32 Sec 1 Q.12. In that stimulus ... -
PT52.S1.Q24 - in response to several bacterial infectionsI know answer choice B is not supported but I can't explain to myself WHY it's wrong. Is it wrong because the terms "apple" and "citrus" should be…
@lllllllll said:
Because McElligott's citrus juices HAVE NOT BEEN LINKED TO ANY BACTERIAL INFECTIONS, can't I assume that they contain less infectious bacteria than M'S apple juice?
No, you can never assume. All we know is that the ... -
Main Point of Argument vs. Main Point of Conclusion questions@"J.Y. Ping" or others that have an answer: How do you know, in LR questions where some Q stems require us to identify the main point of the "Argu…
... I am talking about on PT 34, sect 2 Q18
PT 29 Sec 1 Q 11) are these QS's ... -
Hard LR questions with conditional logicAnyone have any tricky LR problems involving conditional logic that they've encountered and could share? Either individual problems or a list, if you…
PT 61, Sec. 2, Q. 24. Ran into this problem yesterday and made a note to go back to it and try to find questions like it because the conditional logic is unconventional, at least to me. -
[Free LR Tutoring] - PT86.1.Q-Evens Tuesday 9pm CST.What's up 7Sagers, it's your cringe-master, **S**trong-**I**ndependent-**M**an-of-**P**assion, i-think-the-lsat-is-a-cunt, _lsat_sus._ Do you ever…
... LR tutoring session on PT 86 Section 1 EVENS. **Try to have ... our sessions (imo).
1. Goals - prove to you why ... .** note whether or not the Q yielded a predictable pre-phrase ... -
PT 69, Sec. 1, #14We debated this question for a long time in Group BR last night. While almost everyone got the correct answer, we were strongly divided about the act…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-69-section-1-question-14/ -
PT 79 section 1I just took sec 1 of pt79. Has anyone else? I did awful!! My score was much lower than most of my LR sections. I am worried.
I just took sec 1 of pt79. Has anyone else? I did awful!! My score was much lower than most of my LR sections. I am worried. -
Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
What to do to prepare:
Complete PT ... 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark ... -
Tonight RC review pt 63 passages 1/2Hey guys, If youd like to join a study group there will be a review tonight for pt 63 passages 1/2 in the rc secrion. There will also be reviews da…
Hey guys,
If youd like to join a study group there will be a review tonight for pt 63 passages 1/2 in the rc secrion. There will also be reviews daily. Please message if you'd like the link.
Madison -
General Logical Indicator QuestionThis might seem a bit silly, but in after doing the translations into lawgic exercise...do we always diagram logic whenever we see it in any LSAT que…
... LSAT question? For instance pt 27 st 1 q 17, I started reading ... -
When do we know "in other cases" can be helpful or not?Hi, I thought "other cases" are alwas irrelevant to the case discussed in the stimulus... I thought "yes, maybe that happens in this case, but ma…
... /> But for example in PT 71 Sec 1 Q12...the correct answer is ... -
PT63.S1.Q10 - ms. sandstrom's newspaper columnHi all, Blind reviewing the aforementioned Prep Test and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never have these kinds of very basic questio…
... and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never ... this problem sneaky.
1) "Thus, Ms. Sandstrom should pay ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-1-question-10/ -
"The only", sufficient or necessary?Hello everyone! I am in the middle of reviewing PT 68 section 1 question 24. I had a question about the answer choices. Is answer choice E tran…
... the middle of reviewing PT 68 section 1 question 24.
I had ... -
Help! Fool Proof Method Days Stacking Issue!So I've been fool proofing post CC. I started out on a schedule of 1 PT a day, drilling each game on day 1, 2, and 7. I'm figuring out that games are…
... **: PT 4&3 **Day 5**: PT 5&4&1 **Day 6**: PT 6 ... &5&1 **Day 7**: PT ... 7&6&3&1 ... . Instead, I have been doing 1 PT per day and simply attempting ... -
Context Indicators?So, I thought the words: But, although, and However introduce context. But, a lot of the MP/MC that I've done use these words as premise indicators. …
... .
For Example, PT 40, Sec 1, Q9.
Do these ... -
Some/Most (Relative) relationshipsHi everyone, I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships. Good example of this would be P…
Hi everyone,
I am wondering if anyone has a helpful review that I can use for the "some/most/all" relationships.
Good example of this would be PT 33, Sec 3, Q 8. -
How to Understand "most" questions that the curriculum FAILS to teach how to solve?I feel like I'm getting burned by questions that don't use the exhaustive formal logic to solve them. For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14…
... For example, see PT 127, Section 2, Question 24. Just like before ... the answer. Additionally, see PT 127 Section 1 Question 25. Again, ... argue that in PT 120 Section 1 Question 24 trying to translate ... ' to indicate 'the #1 response.' PT 138 Section 3 Question 4 ... -
Negation Help !Some A's are not B's A's -----> not B 's (some) What if I want to negate some A's are not B's? would the negation be .... …
I actually found an excellent example for you!
PT 39 Sec. 2 Q#21 -
How to approach "most logically completes" LR questionsDoes anyone have a specific strategy for these? They seem to be cropping up more often, and I usually do it by gut instinct, which is fine with easy …
... having issue with is PT 74, sec 4, Q 7. I didn't ... -
Will the LSAT ever mention multiple flaws that could be true?Hello, Would the LSAT ever use the same flaw type that has subcategories in the same question? For example, would it ever have multiple answer choic…
PT 33 Sec 1 Q22 is a flaw - except question(each of the following accurately describes a flaw in the lawyers reasoning displayed above except).
I guess this would be an example of multiple flaws in a question. -
PT 69, Sec. 1, #14We debated this question for a long time in Group BR last night. While almost everyone got the correct answer, we were strongly divided about the act…
@DumbHollywoodActor said:
This explanation requires far less assumptions (especially the difficult-to-swallow “The two options give COULD be the ONLY options”) than those previously mentioned.
This is not an assumption, it's ... -
Anyone want to go through the September LSAT questions?Sorry if it's too soon and you're still drinking heavily! I am really really confused about Section 1 Logical Reasoning Q21, the one about Alzheimers…
... /> I need help clarifying LR 1/q 24.
I understand why ... -
PT22.S4.Q19 - contemporary business firmsI could not find anything to prove the conclusion > few people understand current events> and did not see the flaw the LSAT makers identified. He…
... to Answer Choice E in PT 38 Sec 1 Q20. I am not ... -
Help! Fool Proof Method Days Stacking Issue!So I've been fool proofing post CC. I started out on a schedule of 1 PT a day, drilling each game on day 1, 2, and 7. I'm figuring out that games are…
... **: PT 4&3 **Day 5**: PT 5&4&1 **Day 6**: PT 6 ... &5&1 **Day 7**: PT ... 7&6&3&1 ... : PT 1, 3, 4
Day 5: PT 2, 4, 5
Day 6: PT 3, 5 ... -
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
To add to this list - #20 part to whole flaw: PT 62, Sec 2, Q 7. -
Delete.Delete.
... you more context, pt. 68 s.2 q.24's stimulus claims:
MBT QuestionCould someone please explain this to me more. Thanks!
Hi I am so sorry, I am new to this part of 7sage. Its PT 5,Section 1, Q25
