HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 52 | 440 | 519 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.2K |
| 1 | 27.1K | 40.8K |
| number | 4.4K | 5.7K |
| 23 | 1.2K | 1.4K |
-
Significant Drop in Older PT's - Help!So just to give some background I started studying for the October LSAT end of June and was PT-ing around the early160's by the time I wrote the exam…
Just two and I starting PT-ing again 1 week after I wrote October. Maybe it's too early to freak out and just got a little rusty from the week break? -
Advice for Dec 2015Hi everyone-I consistently practice tested from 158-161 right before the Oct LSAT and somehow drastically bombed to a 152. I am quite upset. However,…
... -75, but not all of 1-34). i was able to ... perfect score for one LR section in preptests 74 and 75 ... getting an almost perfect LG section (-1 in Oct '15 vs. -9 ... -
DEC 1995, Logic Game 2 (Please help me understand)Hello, I don't understand why, in the setup, the last row has to be occupied by only supervisors. It's 4 free spots and I only have 3 supervisors …
... will be in Q and 1 will be in S (at ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-17-section-1-game-2/ -
Will the LSAT ever mention multiple flaws that could be true?Hello, Would the LSAT ever use the same flaw type that has subcategories in the same question? For example, would it ever have multiple answer choic…
PT 33 Sec 1 Q22 is a flaw - except question(each of the following accurately describes a flaw in the lawyers reasoning displayed above except).
I guess this would be an example of multiple flaws in a question. -
PT 69, Sec. 1, #14We debated this question for a long time in Group BR last night. While almost everyone got the correct answer, we were strongly divided about the act…
@DumbHollywoodActor said:
This explanation requires far less assumptions (especially the difficult-to-swallow “The two options give COULD be the ONLY options”) than those previously mentioned.
This is not an assumption, it's ... -
Search function?Is there a specific search box for the discussion board (not control + F)? Am I just blind?
Official Dec. LSAT Discussion<font color=red>Admin's note:</font> Thread hijacking! I'm turning this thread into the Official Dec. LSAT Discussion. Here's some ground rules, take…
Wait...so those of us who had 3 LR, did we all have the same order? meaning section 1 was the experimental for all of us who had LR RC LR LR LG?Could really use some guidance.I am getting really flustered to be completely honest. I am not getting much better at this test due to the fact that I just tend to overthink every …
... the questions I missed on PT 52 were pretty tough to be ...When do we get to write our names on the answer sheet?I feel like this is a really silly question, but I tried searching on Google and on the forums here and couldn't find anything... So here goes: When …
@whykaysees said:
the section 1 instructions aren't long enough ...Weaken, Principle and FlawI've gotten to a point where the only types of questions I'm missing are weaken, principle or flaw questions. I usually am on the right path to the c…
... gotten wrong include: Principle: PT 54 Section 2 Q18 (answered A, correct ... answer was C), PT 54 Section 4 Q9 (answered B, correct ... answer was A); Flaw: PT 54 Section 2 Q15 (answered B, correct ...
