@nantesorkestar said:
I just can't see any assumptions the argument is making. In my opinion, C might weaken the argument if the insertion occurs at a random spot. Doesn't this contradict that the fragments are in the same location?
... what JY calls the group 4 logical translation (not both rule ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-6-section-4-game-4/ on question 24, which I ...
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation.
... took an intensive over about 4-5 days for necessary assumption ... a necessary assumption. Consider: PT 39-Section4 Question 19. While I started ... example of this is 37-4-19. These two (among others ...
> @BinghamtonDave said:
> Is the rule you referenced on a game about appetizers and main dish recipes? Is the N "Nutmeg?" I think this might hold one of the keys to understanding the subtlety here.
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section4 question 20.