HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22.1K | 36.7K |
| 83 | 279 | 345 |
| section | 23.4K | 38.4K |
| 1 | 27.2K | 41K |
| question | 29.4K | 48.9K |
| 25 | 2.9K | 3.8K |
-
Can I go up 6+ points before April 25?Hi all! Just took my first PT post-curriculum and feeling down. I got a 163 on my first diagnostic in November (weakest section RC) and a 166 just no…
... all! Just took my first PT post-curriculum and feeling down ... a 166 just now (weakest section 1 LR but the other I ... . I'm taking the 4/25 test, and my goal is ... -
PT 23.S1.G2 and In Out PSET Game 4 (last question)Hi! I was watching the explanation for the in/out game referring to a group of people who can only be hired if they are interviewed for a positio…
... the explanation for the last question in the set, it mentions ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-1-game-2/ -
PT61.S1.Q22 - Question about context and detailsHaving a question about context and details! While reading third paragraph of this last paragraph, the part "glorification"~ made me make a narrat…
Having a question about context and details!
< ... into Q22 (C)
1. Most historians- should be specifically ... ; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"**< ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-1-passage-4-questions/ -
Section C Question 8Did anyone else move immediately away from A because of the more absolute syntax that was being used? I answered incorrectly in both my regular round…
... number, section number and question number in the following format: "PT#.S#.Q ... # - brief description of question ... -
Getting 1 of each question type wrong on PTs. Any advice?Hi all, Instead of getting a bunch of 1 question type wrong on my PTs, I've been getting 1 of 6-7 question types wrong. For example, I'll get 1 N…
... getting a bunch of 1 question type wrong on my ... question types wrong. For example, I'll get 1 Necessary Assumption, 1 Flaw, 1 ... Weaken, etc wrong on a PT. ... this wide variety of question types wrong individually. Does ... -
About how much time should I spend on each of the LR questions?I'm on the MSS section and I'm trying to answer the question before the silent video ends (1m24s). Is that a good estimate for about how much time I …
... you spend per question on an LR section will be distributed across ... minute section divided by 25 questions. On a real-deal timed PT you ... 1-10 range.
Delving a bit beyond your initial question ... -
LR 4/5 Difficulty Q's - more speed and accuracy?Any advice on how to get better at LR 4/5 star difficulty Q's? I'm like -7 for LR (both sections) and almost all of the 7 wrong are all level 4/5 que…
... are also kinda scattered throughout question types.
> >
1 in LR and get these ... up. PT 23, Section 3, #25 - this is one example of a question that ... do more drilling on those question types.
Yea i ... -
129--->157My first official LSAT score was 129. Not a diagnostic literally an official 129 5 years ago while I was a senior in college in 2018. 129-139-145-149…
... was my hardest section but figure out which question type you are ... most and then drill that question type. Loophole in LR ... : say I am taking PT 83. PT 83 has 4 sections but two ... I had 4 sections 1 LR, 1 RC and 2 LG ... it based on 1 LR, 1 RC and 1 LG and then ... -
First Blind Review - Need Help for Questions I couldn't get (instructors and people good at LR !)First of all, I'd like to apologize if this isn't the correct place to ask this, but in the lesson J.Y. said to ask someone who knows more than you, …
... LR section (section 1) of PT 7.
Actual timed go: 14/25
Blind Review: 20/25 (very happy! )
diagramming conditional within conditionalhi there, i have a question on diagramming multiple conditionals: e.g., Q#15, section 1 of PT #63 (june 2011), choice B states, "if someone tells …
... a question on diagramming multiple conditionals: e.g., Q#15, section 1 of PT ... choice but i had a question as to how we'd ...A confusion relates to Lawgic and Sufficent Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... , basically this is it:
1. "A-->C + A --> ... />
For example, PT 24, LR2, Section 3, Question 19. Sufficient Assumption.
1. "Do not go home for ...A specific Lawgic Confusion and Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... , basically this is it:
1. "A-->C + A --> ... />
For example, PT 24, LR2, Section 3, Question 19. Sufficient Assumption.
1. "Do not go home for ...Main Point Question (implied conclusion)I have noticed that in main point questions the conclusion is not clearly present sometimes, and when this happens, it is very important that one use…
... in PT28, LR2 Section 3 and PT 30, LR 1, Section 2. Does anyone ...Logic Chain (ish) questionHello, I've got a common question about linking up a logic chain. I just re-watched the video lesson but it's not precisely the answer to my questio…
... /> I've got a common question about linking up a logic ... precisely the answer to my question. Any help is appreciated!
My question is from PT 47 section 3, number 21. According ...PT June 2007.S1.Q17 (G3) - MBThttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-1-game-3/ In the logic games section of the June 2007 LSAT, question 17 of the cruise li…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-1-game-3/
In ... the logic games section of the June 2007 LSAT, question 17 of ...PT 72 Section 3Is section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT 72 is weird and I shouldn't be discouraged by lower scores on this test than the others.…
... section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT ... on the first LR section of this PT but I did horribly ... on section 3. What are your ... experiences with this PT?PT 26 - "susceptible to proof" meaningHey all, What does the phrase "susceptible to proof" mean? The context is an answer choice for a LR question, "A reasoning error in the argument i…
... answer choice for a LR question, "A reasoning error in the ... ."
This is Section 3, Question 10, PT 26 for your reference ...1 Question, 1 Word of inspiration, and 1 Skype user name:1. How far back is safe for me to take real LSATs? A little bit ago I read somewhere that anything before 40 is too different and can throw you off s…
1. How far back is safe ... totally fine with doing a PT a day). My point is ... trainer now, or powerscores and PT/BR (not sure what BR ...PrepTest 17 - Section 2 - Question 01can someone help me understand question 1? if they say the price of oil is connected to the price of cement, how can answer B be the correct answer? …
can someone help me understand question 1? if they say the price of oil is connected to the price of cement, how can answer B be the correct answer? wouldnt oil be the source of energy to all the kilns?General Logical Indicator QuestionThis might seem a bit silly, but in after doing the translations into lawgic exercise...do we always diagram logic whenever we see it in any LSAT que…
... in any LSAT question? For instance pt 27 st 1 q 17, I ...PT47.S3.Q19 - although high cholesterol levels (wording question)http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-3-question-19/ When you encounter the word "contributes" on the LSAT, do you take this to be a "c…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-47-section-3-question-19/
When you ... always have assumed so, but PT 47, S3, Q19 threw me ...Can't do a frigging PTGuys. Help. I can't finish a pt anymore. After 1 section I'm like...I can't right now. This happened Wednesday. Then today I came back to the same p…
... can't finish a pt anymore. After 1 section I'm like...I ... came back to the same pt, I was like ok I ... if nothing happened. Did one section..and gave up. Wtf happened ...Opinions on study schedule for Dec LSATNew to 7Sage discussions, but I love how everyone seems very helpful and genuine. I am currently studying for the Dec test, and wanted some opinions …
... .
I currently am PT'ing around 168-169 average ... and PT'ing. I currently have PT 29-38, and like 25 ... Cambridge packets for all LG PT 1-38, and for Weaken, ... miss avg 5 for this section, but not sure which ... , I currently work about 25-30 hours a week and ...Experimental Section while PTingWhere do you typically put yours -- do you alternate between it being section 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5? Perhaps a silly question.
Where do you typically put yours -- do you alternate between it being section 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5? Perhaps a silly question.LSAT Prep Test 32, October, 2000, Section 3, Questions 19-24, Game 4, Rule 2LSAT Prep Test 32 October, 2000 Section 3, Questions 19-24 Game 4 2nd Rule States That G Is In Slot 1, So G Cannot Be In Slot 7. Contrpos…
... />
October, 2000
Section 3, Questions 19-24
1, So G Cannot Be In ... Is Not In Slot 1.
Question: Why Is Not A ... Slot 7, But Not In 1?PT58.S4.Q23 - eight large cratersIn my opinion, this is the hardest question on PT 58. I missed it because I didn't understand what B was saying. Can someone help me translate it/e…
... opinion, this is the hardest question on PT 58. I missed it ... is my translation:
1.) There is no known volcano ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-23/Trying out something new... thoughts?Hello All: Quick preface: 1. I am taking the Dec. 2015 LSAT. 2. I started at 132 3. average PT score is 152/154 4. Target Score: ANYTHING over…
... 132
3. average PT score is 152/154
PT's iv'e taken ... on this PT (PT67)
On the LG section, I ... s the breakdown:
Section 1 (RC) - 13/27 (-14). ... got 1 guess right.
Section 2 (LR1) - 11/25 (-14 ...PT June 2007.S2.Q23 - philosopher: an action is morally right ifI'm not sure why 1) negating morally right to mean morally wrong is incorrect and 2) negating right to mean wrong is incorrect. Please explain! http…
I'm not sure why 1) negating morally right to mean morally wrong is incorrect and 2) negating right to mean wrong is incorrect. Please explain!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-23Feedback on PT schedule for June?Just set up a schedule and would appreciate some feedback. Made sure to take 2-3 tests per week, and on the weeks I take 3 to include one retake to h…
... )
April 14- PT 45
April 17- PT 73
April ... - PT 41
April 25- PT 50
April 27- PT 68
May 1- PT ... 60
May 3- PT 57
May 5- PT 72 ...PT June 2007.S2.Q24 - car companies solicit consumer informationI have been analyzing all the June 2007 (public domain) questions one by one, and find that they all neatly fit into very neat symbolic argument patt…
... argument patterns--except for Section II Question 24. I would appreciate ... any comments on this particular question, especially if someone can ... is a free PT! You can see the question and explanation ... /lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-24
