HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 87 | 205 | 250 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 2 | 23.7K | 33.4K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 18 | 1.4K | 1.7K |
-
PT43.S2.Q20 - social critic: one of the most important wayshttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-43-section-2-question-20/ I find this to be the most interesting LR question I've come across, because I'…
... commented in the comment section of PT43.2.20, so I'd ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-43-section-2-question-20/#comment-72130
You wrote in the comment section that (B) is saying “**_fail ... -
'Even without''even without' does not seem to follow our group 3 indicator rules.... Ella can pass even without giving her presentation Using Group 3 rules I…
... stuck on this while doing PT 37 section 2 qs 3.....such an ... -
PT62.S2.Q25 - university president: our pool of applicantsHey guys, I am having trouble understanding what is wrong with C. Even though I initially picked the right answer which is A I can't seem up eliminat…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-62-section-2-question-25/
The argument ... -
PT19.S2.Q17 - people cannot devote themselvesPT19. S2. Q17 Hi everyone, I'm having trouble with this one. Here is how I diagrammed it. premise1) devote to study natural process---- have leisur…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-17/
[Context]
PT14.S4.Q9 - anyone who supports the new tax planI'm really having trouble with this question. Am I supposed to approach it as a sufficient assumption question though it's a flaw question? Thanks in…
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section 4 question 20.Causation/correlation and phenomenonHello, everyone. I’ve been drilling strengthening questions and I’m having an issue with causation/correlation and phenomenon type arguments. The lin…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-04/
[Phenomenon]
Causation/correlation and phenomenonHello, everyone. I’ve been drilling strengthening questions and I’m having an issue with causation/correlation and phenomenon type arguments. The lin…
... being able to label the question as one or the other ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-2-question-14/
Here Kim ...PT73.S2.Q19 - a carved flint objectCould someone be so kind to explain why AC B is correct? I went with E, quite confidently at that. Any insight is greatly appreciated. Thanks in a…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-73-section-2-question-19/
A carved ...Diagramming SA'sTo all of you who are masters of SA's: do you diagram them on the actual exam? I feel that if I don't then, I won't get them correct. Should I diagra…
>@"Alex Divine" said:
>Although there was a tough one about sentient beings on PT62? that I had to diagram...
I remember that one. I skipped first. lol
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-62-section-4-question-18/Invalid Vs. Valid Argument Forms (When are these applicable?)I did see a post on distinguishing these argument forms a little while ago, but my question is when are these applicable? I only imagine that these a…
... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-17-section-2-question-16/
PT23 ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-2-question-19/
PT24. ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-2-question-21/
PT27 ... com/lsat_explanations/lsat-27-section-4-question-07/
...Restrictive variables in in-out gamesI’m looking at PT 70’s game 2 right now and I’m trying to understand the intuition behind question 12. “Which one of the following is a pair of emplo…
This type of question has repeated several times ... be in: in 70-2 that number would be ... 4
2.The removal of the necessary ... stated condition.
Question 12: is the second option ... see: PT 11-Game 3 Question 19, PT 20 Game 2 question 12
Public Opinion = majority?Hi! In LR, when something is said to be of public opinion of a given society, does that imply that more than half of the people in that region belie…
... /> I was looking at PT43, Section 2, Question 21 about the curator and ...Public Opinion = majority?Hi! In LR, when something is said to be of public opinion of a given society, does that imply that more than half of the people in that region belie…
... ; I was looking at PT43, Section 2, Question 21 about the curator and ...Examples of Common Flaws#help Hello! Wanted to know if anyone had PT questions for some common flaws that I can watch? I'm looking for a necessary/sufficiency confusion …
Hey again,
Here is a _very_ partial list of correlation-causation flaws:
PT20.S1.Q10 (★★★), PT20.S4.Q14 (★★★), PT30.S2.Q25 (★★★★), PT31.S2.Q9 (★★★★), PT64.S1.Q5 (★), PT65.S1.Q8 (★), PT66.S4.Q25(★★★)Mostly Strongly SupportedI am still in the process of going through these lessons so I might be ahead of myself but is there a formula for tackling most strongly support ques…
... them. You can revisit the question(s) after you learn more ... point us to a specific question or two that you particularly ... or telling us the PT number,section, and question number. Perhaps we will ...Favorite JY QuotesI realize there's likely a bunch of old threads about this, but what are some of everyone's favorite lines from JY? A recent one for me comes from P…
3:44: "Or, maybe they did in fact have a HUUUUGE boner for Homer but there wasn't enough Homer to go around."
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-21/PT23.S2.Q14 - Kim: In northern Europe during the eighteenthCan someone please help me understand what the stimulus is saying. https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-2-question-14/ **Admin n…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-2-question-14/
>
> ...Rare argument form: the "Tether" assumptionHey everyone, Across my studies, one thing that I have tried to do with LR is to look at arguments as repetitions of older forms of arguments. Tryi…
... and it seems like PT21 Section 2 Question 5 might fall withing this ...PT31.S3.Q14 - Ethicist: Both ASA and TPA are clot-dissolvingHey 7Sagers, We're posting on behalf of a 7Sager. They would like to get advice from you! ************** LSAT PT 31 JUNE 2000 sectio…
... the structure.
In PT31 Section 2 Question 04, the sentence with "what ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-04/
https://7sage.com ...PT49.S2.Q15 - The greater the number of people who regularly use a productThe greater the number of people who regularly use a product, the greater the number whose health is potentially at risk due to that product. More pe…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-2-question-15/
Answer choice ... important to be tested.
2. It is not important to ... you read it. A good question to ask here would be ...Malcom Gladwell takes the LSATBelow is a link to Gladwell's podcast (part 1) where he talks about his experience taking the LSAT. There's still another part to come but the pod en…
... SpaceX.
2. I also don't get ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-40-section-3-question-12/)
). ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-2-question-08/)) As @"Jonathan Wang ... every single parallel reasoning question). Regular chess is also ...NA vs. SA question stemI just went thru PT7 S4 Q13 and came across a question stem that’s says *“In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the fo…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-2-question-20/NA vs. SA question stemI just went thru PT7 S4 Q13 and came across a question stem that’s says *“In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the fo…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-2-question-20/
I think ...NA vs. SA question stemI just went thru PT7 S4 Q13 and came across a question stem that’s says *“In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the fo…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-2-question-20/
>
> ...When stats are a premiseIn a sufficient assumption question (and also, I could imagine the scenario w/ "which of the following would justify" questions or strengthen questio…
... you don't want a question from a 36+ preptest spoiled ... link to a sufficient assumption question with the statistic being correct ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-36-section-1-question-18Start a Thread on all the funny things JY says in Explanations?I was wondering if we wanted to start a post/thread on all the funny/crazy things JY has said on the explanation videos? A little something to make u…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-84-section-2-question-15/), [I'm not sure ... .com/lesson/budget-approval-flaw-question/), [What the fuck is happening ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-72-section-4-game-4/)
Confusing S for N versus N for SPremise: Resign--->Convicted Conclusion: Convicted--->Resign Would this be confusing N for S or S for N? I thought the two were interchangeable but…
The answer choice says confusing S for N though. That is why I am confused. PT 22, Section 2, #25Mistaken Reversal versus Mistaken NegationAren't the two logical equivalents? Mistaken Reversal is "confusing Necessary for Sufficient" while it's the other way around for Mistaken Negation. …
The question I am referring to is from PT22.S2.Q25.
**Admin Note:** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-2-question-25/
