@CrushLSAT said:
question 19 (which asks for a complete and accurate list of doctors at Souderton) be E (N and P)? Why can't the ~N --> J pair be treated the same as ~O --> J? If we only have N and P, aren't we still good since we have at ...
@"steve-10" said:
The correct answer to Q1, the typical "acceptable configuration" question, implies T — W (where "—" is the usual notation indicating relative order).
Well, it does imply that T -- W is a possibility. T -- W ...
@akistole Yes, I agree to your point. While explaining the passage , JY interpreted the 'they' as Biochemists but while explaining one of the questions eg Q11 ,he mentioned they as cytologists.
I didn't understand that Q11 explanation.
... for a month till May 11 (planning to purchase all the ... then do timed PT's from May 11 till the test date ... on June 11. I have been working full ...
... took the LR sections of PT 60, and only improved my ... I took the sections from PT 30, I got -3 on ... this pretty normal, considering that PT 60 was written so long ... the RC section of PT 65 and got 11 questions worse than ...
... physically in clear sheet binders PT 38-56. After I am ... LR. But, from the latest PT I took with RC (Feb ... in BR, in another PT, -12 and BR -11 and -14 and ...