HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 21.9K | 36.5K |
| c | 6.8K | 11.6K |
| section | 23.2K | 38.2K |
| 2 | 23.6K | 33.3K |
| q | 2.2K | 3.2K |
| 21 | 1K | 1.2K |
-
PT77.S2.Q19 - a recent study examinedHi All, So I'm still struggling to identify exactly when certain arguments could be strengthened or weakened by the total number of samples (or a…
... trend) etc.
PT 77 Section 2 #19: A recent study examined ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-2-question-19/ -
How to diagram "is"/"usually"How do you diagram "is"/"usually" statements? For example, PT 54 Section 4 Q 22. "The morally preferable act is usually the one that serves the lo…
... "/"usually" statements? For example, PT 54 Section 4 Q 22.
"The ... -
Descriptive premises with normative conclusions in sufficient assumption questionsIs it always the case that if an argument for a sufficient assumption question has descriptive premises with a normative conclusion (saying one shoul…
... /> Looking at PT 22, Section 4, Q13 and PT 62, Section 2, Q17, I can ... -
What's the LSAT's definition of "linked"?In PT 77, Section 2, Questions 5 and 14 they both use the word "linked" in their arguments. When the LSAT uses the word "linked," does it only mean c…
In PT 77, Section 2, Questions 5 and 14 they both use the word "linked" in their arguments. When the LSAT uses the word "linked," does it only mean correlation? -
PT54.S2.Q21 - most people who become migraine sufferers hi, can someone explain why answer choice e isnt a match? I'm still not 100% sure after BRing and watching the explination vid. https://7sage.com/l…
hi, can someone explain why answer choice e isnt a match? I'm still not 100% sure after BRing and watching the explination vid.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-54-section-2-question-21/ -
Proposition QuestionsProposition questions: should I approach these like an inference question or a principle question? I've read different things. Example of this questi…
Proposition questions: should I approach these like an inference question or a principle question? I've read different things. Example of this question type is PT 82 section 2 question 14.
Thanks in advance! -
PT76.S2.Q21 - although the first humans cameHello, As we all know, matching the formal elements in answer choices to the stimulus is a good way to find the correct answer on Parallel type qu…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-76-section-2-question-21/ -
PT41.S2.Q13 (G3) - Each of the seven members of the boardHello, I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from LG 3. Q13 asks for a complete and accurate list of members that could be in the…
... , I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-2-game-3/ -
PT76.S2.Q21 - Although the first humans came to AustraliaCan someone please explain to me how the argument is flawed and why the correct answer is B? **Admin note: edited title** https://7sage.com/lsat_…
Can someone please explain to me how the argument is flawed and why the correct answer is B?
**Admin note: edited title**
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-76-section-2-question-21/ -
PT30.S2.Q21 - The new agriculture bill will almost surely failWhy is A the right answer? Isn't A just the contrapositive of E? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-2-question-21/ **Admin note:…
Why is A the right answer? Isn't A just the contrapositive of E?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-2-question-21/
**Admin note: edited title** -
PT 3 SECTION 2 QUESTION 5I chose D, but I think I might have mistaken this for a strengthen question. However, I don't understand how E is correct. Why does the fact that it …
I chose D, but I think I might have mistaken this for a strengthen question. However, I don't understand how E is correct. Why does the fact that it doesn't show that megatelescope research is worhty for comparison.... matter? I feel like this is one of ... -
Weak answer choice in Necessary AssumptionI am a little confused about the weak answer and strong answer choice in necessary assumption question. So it said in the CC that we should always lo…
... the correct answer. For example, PT 24 Section 2, Q17. The AC B ... -
Consistency in LRI am having trouble with consistency in LR sections. Some days I will take a PT and go -3 to -5 on the LR sections, and other times (like today PT 84…
... days I will take a PT and go -3 to -5 ... , and other times (like today PT 84 section 2) I will get -12 ... -
PT31.S2.Q21. - Is it necessary to draw the same Lawgic as JY Ping?Hi everyone, I am going through 7Sage CC, and I am currently on Alicia’s Bank Deposits – PF Question (PT31.S2.Q21). JY drew the Lawgic of the sti…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-21/ -
Tutoring sessionsHello everyone after taking the August LSAT and a short break I want to give back. I want to offer free tutoring to everyone, one on one or groups de…
... be doing Blind review for PT 50 Section 2 (LR) on Saturday (9 ... )
Also Blind Review for PT 50 Section 1 (LG) on Sunday ... -
Where can I find LR video explanations?I'm working through some LR drills and going over my wrong answers, but can't seem to find video explanations for PT 3 Section 4, PT 15 Section 2, an…
... video explanations for PT 3 Section 4, PT 15 Section 2, and PT A Section 4. Any ... to find PT 3, but couldn't get videos for section 4 ... specifically. Same goes for the other PT videos ... -
PT56.S2.Q23 - Can anyone explain how this is an illegal reversal to me?<a href="https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/forums/q23-ecologist-without-the-intervention-of-t579.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.manhattanprep.com/…
... is described here. It is PT 56 Section 2 Question 23. I was ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-2-question-23/ -
PT9.S2.Q20 - A university should not be encouraged to patent...Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is A for PT 9, Section 2, Question 20?
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is A for PT 9, Section 2, Question 20? -
Point of Issue - Y/N list or honing in on difference?Hello there. Question on point of issue questions - which is better? doing the list method or reading through and determining the disagreement/agree…
Hey Quinn, a great example of the "MSS" is PT 61, Section 2 Q7.
Notice how Talbert didn't say anything about Chess should be taught. Talbert just lists good factors about chess which you have to imply that Talbert is for chess. -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
If any one is curious the question that I'm looking at with regards to the above is PT 49, Section 2 Question 17 -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
... "Some and Most Relationships." PT 30, Section 2, Q20 has an illustration of ... -
PT35.S2.P4 - ronald dworkin argues that judges arehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-4-passage/ I am a long-time lurker that is gearing up for the October exam. I really…
Following up on RC: PT 35, Section 2
My specific questions include:< ... -
PT10.S4.Q21 - the proper way to plan a scientific projectI really don't like the way answer choice (E) is worded. It's too ambiguous and abstract that I was not able to wrap my head around it during timed c…
@"Sky is the Limit" said:
Can someone explain to me what (E) is even saying?
I think the real flaw is that there is an assumption that failing to have a "proper" plan for an endeavor means the endeavor should no longer ... -
PT74.S1.Q16 - debater: as a pedagogical practiceHi folks, I'm struggling with this question in BR. So I figured I'd post my reasoning and see what you all think of it. Debater: Premise 1:Be…
... as the LSAT (See PT 19 Section 2 Question 1 for a throwback ... -
"A few" versus "Few"Hi all, So I know "a few" is logically equivalent to "some" (more than 1), but for "few," can we say that it is logically equivalent to the opposi…
... highly problematic. Check out PT 1 Section 4 Question 21 Answers D & ... -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... phenomena can be found on PT 49 Section 2 Question 7. I've ... : I'm thinking here of PT 53 Section 1 Question 8. I ... -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... has drilling sets from particular PT ranges, something incredibly helpful.)
PT.
Because vague ... example: today I took PT 56. Section 3 Question 10 on that ... 12 days ago I reviewed PT 37 Section 2 Question 19, is the ... -
'Even without''even without' does not seem to follow our group 3 indicator rules.... Ella can pass even without giving her presentation Using Group 3 rules I…
... stuck on this while doing PT 37 section 2 qs 3.....such an ...
