HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22.1K | 36.7K |
| s | 69.5K | 125.6K |
| needed | 3.6K | 4K |
| for | 108.4K | 225K |
| starter | 1.1K | 1.4K |
-
PT86.S3.Q26(P4) - Physicists discuss the Big BangB. The initial space of our universe resembles cold, empty space C. A hot and dense state is a state of low entropy Correct answer is C. I chose …
... B. After watching JY's explanation I still have ... &C’s addition to other physicists's Multiverse Theory. ... and C&C's reasoning that the state ... more sense to me for the author (a sympathetic ... please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q#(P#) - [brief description ... -
PT71.S3.Q24 - If concrete is poured whileOkay so for this question I got it right but would have taken way less time if I understood something. I've been doing logic for a while but this one…
Okay so for this question I got it ... . I've been doing logic for a while but this one ... ; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"
PT48.S4.Q18 - Leadership depends as muchThis is a MBF question. Its specific type is a conditional MBF. I know going into this question, the LSAT writers are going to do a MBF answer choice…
... approach the question. My approach for this question would be "hunting ... " for the ACs because in line ... with that. But in JY's explanation - he brushed that sentence ... ; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"
< ...PT72.S2.Q16 - There are already more great artworksI am putting this question out there, because after flagging this question and blind reviewing, I still got it wrong. Currently, I am blind reviewin…
... gaps in understanding.
For this question, when it came ... (gap in argument)
For step 5, I was able ... lifetime. So E seems wrong for the reason. But I still ... ; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"
what we're all thinking: picking up the pieces after Sept LSATHi all -- Like quite a few of you on here, I was just gutted by the lsat yesterday. I was PTing as high as 169, and hitting a consistent 167 in m…
... 167 in my last three PT's before the test.
... a high score on a PT (including the 169), I ... will make any special accommodations for us.
(2) ... . So should I schedule for the November test? Or ... />
Thanks in advance for your advice.160--->176 on July Digital Test while working full time-- my story and tipsHi team, I've been meaning to write this post since I got my July score, but I wanted to give a brief recap of my LSAT experience while working fu…
... do a game. Waiting for a doctor's appointment? Oh you know ... 's iPad for a week and did a couple practice sections on PT ... amazing curriculm, JY's comforting and assuring voice for explaining shit in ... not now. Your brain's gotta rest. Go for a run. Go ...PT11.S2.Q19 - Televisions vs NewspapersI picked D and confirmed myself in review. The conclusion of the argument seem to be that watching network TV increases tendency to think of publ…
... people watch TV news for a simple view on ... and than read the papers for the "full" view on ... 30 seconds using slogans, that's why it is "simplifying" ... that the TV watcher's understanding of the issue ... please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"October TestHey guys, So my timed PT's are around 152-155 and I'm BR'ing around 160-161. Currently scheduled for the October test but having second thoughts …
... ,
So my timed PT's are around 152-155 and ... around 160-161. Currently scheduled for the October test but having ...PT88.S1.Q17 (G3) - flowers gameHey guys, could someone help me understand why (e) is the correct answer? I seem to be able to produce at least one possible world in which everyone …
... setup/questions mostly right. It's just this last question that ... /> Thank you so much! Sorry for violating any norms here: I ... just signed up for the course and haven't ... title to fit formatting guidelines: "PT#.S#.Q# (G#) - brief description ...PT88.S4.Q24 - Can you weaken causal relations with “no cause, but effect”Powerscore says 1 way to weaken a casual conclusion is to show that “Although effect occurs, the cause did not occur.” This is bc (According to po…
... cause.
But in PT 88.4.24, AC A ... seems to fit into powerscore’s definition of weakening causality. Is ... AC too weak?
For me, AC A seems to ... ; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"
