Something is really bothering me about this question, but it's not integral to getting it correct. If deceit is a quality of rottenness, that means that rottenness implies deceit, not the other way around. Which means that the first part of the argument ...
How is E right if in G's assertion's says that an equal number of photographers, sculptors and painters submitted work that met the traditional criteria for the show?
Hi, I chose the right answer, but I just wanna know how the psychologist reasons.
I thought the argument would have made more sense if the conclusion were "expressing gratitude anonymously is bad for the society."
So, what support does the ...
I ran into something that kind of tripped me up and I wanted to hear from someone else (hint, it's the phrase "in order to"). Can I break the argument down as follows? ...
I am confused about the logic translations seen in the video explanation for a particular LR question:
**LSAT PrepTest 49, Section 4, Question 16**
Link: https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-4-question-16/
I would like to see a video breakdown of this question
**Admin Note: Edited titled. Please use the format "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question"**
Correct answer B The only thing we know for sure reading the argument is that the studies encourage overestimation of the degree to wich some food additives are carcinogenic.
A We don’t know
C We don’t know
D We don’t know
E We ...
Could someone help me with why D is not the correct answer?
In the second paragraph, it gives the stats for carbon taxes and says "It should be noted, however, that these numbers ignore the effect ...
I'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw?
Is PT 52 S3 Q4 a false appeal flaw?
Is PT 54 S4Q16 an implication flaw ?
thanks
I choose A, I thought it was a Sufficente/ Necessity error confusion, but I can understand that the suttle part is when the argument give us an example of a recent research where flexibility works better than tighten groups if a common purpose is shared, ...