I am between AC (C) and (D), however feel (C) is incorrect due to the wording of such. While the part about "providing reasons for rejecting an alternative course of action" fits the description, answer choice (C) also claims "it arrives at it's conclusion ...
I got this question wrong both before and after BR and the explanations did not help but I finally think I understand it so I wanted to help anyone still confused like I was!
Here is how I logically mapped it out (I,F, and U mean inviting, ...
High blood cholesterol -> increased risk of stroke by blood clots
Low blood cholesterol -> increased risk of OTHER stroke by cerebral hermorrhage (how? Low bc weakens artery ...
I thought this question was rather difficult but there is no explanation video, so just dropping my thought process/notes here. Please feel free to share yours!
P says ok eventually all mental stuffs can be explained in neurological terms < ...
Did anyone else pick C instead of B? I thought that the 24 policy showed that it was important to have continuity of care so that if the doctors are tired during a shift it wouldn't have good continuity. But realizing now that I made a lot of assumptions ...
S2- /Teachers have the power to ... />
[S1] Teachers effective [S2] Enable students to make decision ... true. S[1] and [S2] are not chained together ... it is false according to S2
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-2-question-14/
It seems as answer A is actually agreeing with Lee's argument. Am I incorrect by thinking that the question stem is asking for us to refute Lee's argument?
I'm not sure why 1) negating morally right to mean morally wrong is incorrect and 2) negating right to mean wrong is incorrect. Please explain!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-23