For three LR section, I am pretty sure which one is the experimental section because the second one I took has one stimulus but two questions (Q9-Q10), which is certainly not the modern LSAT style(after PT60s)
I second @"Nilesh S"
I'm pretty sure it would be against rules to post actual screenshots of the stimulus. But if you use referencing such as "PT 35 S1 Q15" and then post your question about it, then it should be alright.
@jac376 said:
Flaw: The correlation of Ra, C, and (C --> Rh) does not mean there is a causation from C to Ra. The answer which strengthens this argument will show that (Rh --> Ra) (C causes Ra because it causes Rh which causes Ra) or directly ...
@Sho'nuff thanks! I'll be out of town on the 8th (with limited access to wifi) but can definitely join on the other dates. My goal is to complete 1 practice test/ week - I'm wrapping up PT38 tomorrow and will work on PT37 for next week.
We want an answer that contradicts the stimulus, not one that is irrelevant. The stimulus essentially states that if you’re restricting, then you preventing negative effects. TO contradict that,we negate it: Restricting AND not preventing negative effects. ...
Interesting. You're positive the NA isn't actually necessary? I'm curious about these examples. I didn't look closely at it, but PT 71.S1.Q11 seems to be about pollution. Is that the right reference? PT means PrepTest, right?