Can someone help me to identify opponent's argument, since I don't see clearly where is a conclusion and where are premises. All I see is a set of premises with unstated(assumed) conclusion. Thank you!! #help
Can someone please explain how did we get C as correct AC. We don't have to have same totals in order to get same percentages. Why does this question requires us to make this assumption? Thank you!
My issue is in the the stimulus finding the conclusion. Can Someone please help?
**Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"**
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-1-question- ...
In the stem it talks about a case of polio occurring due to the administration of a vaccine of 12 per year. By doing an alt vaccine, it gets cut into half 6
Could someone please explain how you got to C in S1Q14? I narrowed it down to C and E but do not fully understand why C was the better choice. Is it just because frequency was incorrectly attributed to visibility rather than headlight use? Thank you so ...
First of all, the conclusion. There are no conclusion indicators and I was confused between 2 statements to select for the conclusion. Secondly, answer choice (A) and (C), aren't they basically both saying the same ...
I'm a little confused about the relationship between the taxes and bus fare in this stimulus. In the first sentence, when it says bus fares are subsidized by city taxes, does that mean at least some of the fare is covered by these taxes? And when the ...
I really need help with answer choice A because it seems perfectly fine to me. Is this answer choice incorrect because the argument against internal relations in paragraph 4 stated that "to truly know an entity, we must know all of its relationships?" Is ...
Hi! Can any one explain how they approached this parallel flaw question about perception? JY tries mapping but it would take me a long time to do and I am trying to see if there's something about the structure of the stimulus that can be used to get to the ...
I'm not at all understanding the answer to this question. As far as I can tell, _none_ of the answer choices seem to be even somewhat related to voter reactions except choice D.
D creates a situation wherein public perception is "Politicians ...
So I picked C the first time around and I wanted to know if this would have been the correct answer if the stimulus had concluded that the government's decision to limit the nuclear power plant's liability in case of a nuclear accident was an unwise ...
Why does C weaken the argument if the low-income individuals aren't taxpayers? Isn't the city councilor's proposal to raise bus fares only meant to help taxpayers?
Edit: Answer choice C says "all" councilors believe that low-income people ...
So this particular question has about 8 years worth of comments and about as much time's worth of confusion regarding why D weakens the argument because it seems to be attacking a premise, namely the one stating that these painters have to eat sea animals ...
For a question like this that states "Which of the following indicates an error in the reasoning leading to the prediction", am I looking to attack a major premise instead of the conclusion? I got this question wrong and I am having difficulty discerning ...
I got it correct by POE, but I was enticed by A and even after getting it right I still don't 100% understand. 7Sage doesn't have explanations for this test. Thanks in advance!
**Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - ...
Intro - What's up my putitassss - it's your slaveboi lsat_sus back at it with "anotha one."
Hook - "the LSAT is the Great Equalizer" (to an extent). This is the best quote of all time. I personally couldn't/still can't find a damn "normal" ...