https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-3-question-23
I understand the reasoning in the video, that just because X is preceded by Y, it doesn’t mean that Y is the necessary condition.
Hey, could someone help explain why E is the correct answer choice? I understand why others are incorrect.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-3-question-19/
I don't really understand answer choice A) if there is no overwhelming evidence for or against a hypo. then one should "suspend judgment as to its truth". What does it mean by "as to its truth"? Anyone could help?
Can anyone explain why S3 Q24 on PT 93 is B and not C? I know C has the conclusion less clearly delineated but other than that it seems to match up slightly better.