I don’t think I understand the fundamental argument here... Initially I hesitantly chose A (the correct answer) thinking - the professor disputes the crater causing the extinction, this is irrelevant. However, during my review, I switched to E thinking he ...
Im so confused by a rule in this game which looks like an inclusive "OR BOTH" rules but in the video J.Y diagrams it as a "NOT BOTH"... can anyone help me understand why?
I don't understand how executives from other companies setting salaries higher could have an impact on the salaries of executives from other companies?
I got my October score back and it was a pretty big increase from my previous take (over 15 points). Is it advisable to write a LSAT Addendum? There's a lot of conflicting or old advice so I thought I'd check in here! Thanks.