With regards to the second rule, does anyone know why we can't simply place both F&G in out group? JY's explanation suggests placing G (Out) in one world and F (In) in the second world.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-1-game ...
I'm hoping that someone might be willing to check my thinking/analysis before I go to the explanation. It has been suggested that if we write out an explanation for our thought process that it helps to solidify our learning. This is my attempt to follow ...
So, I've done this question many many times. And I've never felt great about it. Can some run it down for me?
Specifically, answer choice A.
Here's what A looks like:
A:
Writer has right ---> Author granted writer the right< ...
I'm having trouble negating and translating the first sentence of this question. How am I supposed to negate a sentence with two group four indicators?
Blind reviewing the aforementioned Prep Test and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never have these kinds of very basic questions below (i.e., what exactly is the conclusion?) But bear with me, I found this problem sneaky ...
If you watched the video explanation for this question, could you please help me understand what exactly is it saying? I watch it at least 15 times and I am still puzzled by it. Read all the related posting, still no help.
I have a question on answer choice C.
I understand the flaw of the survey: how it fails to distinguish the residents who dropped out in its own schools and those who dropped out of schools from somewhere else. But, after ...
I just took Preptest 2, Section 1 twice (once timed, once untimed) and BOTH TIMES got my butt kicked...even going through the correct answers now, I'm like "What?? How on earth is that correct?" Has anyone else taken this section ...
Still trying to tease out the stimulus on this one. I don't understand what the two different DNA tests are or how they are confused or what the assumption is.
Premise: DNA tests can't distinguish among samples from different people. ...
When I first began my LSAT studying journey, I found flaw questions to be very straight forward. They have unfortunately turned into a question where I often find myself second guessing on my AC ...
Can someone explain to me this stimulus? It says "Which one of the following could be an accurate and complete list of the students who review only _Sunset_?" Usually, the "complete and accurate" stimuli want a list of all the items across all possible ...
Can someone explain why B is correct for this question? I find this question confusing, mostly because the way the prompt asks for a principle that if established will prove both sides of the argument correct.