When it comes to these harder disagreement type questions, are we supposed to look for what the two speakers explicitly disagree about or is it supposed to be implied? The video explanation seemed to indicate that it was the latter, but I feel that answer ...
I'm a bit confused about the last paragraph. It states that the soil that was taken from land that's been out of production for twenty years contains beneficial microorganisms in the first sentence but when I go further, it states that beneficial ...
@jac376 said:
Flaw: The correlation of Ra, C, and (C --> Rh) does not mean there is a causation from C to Ra. The answer which strengthens this argument will show that (Rh --> Ra) (C causes Ra because it causes Rh which causes Ra) or directly ...
... / SA questions: S3.Q04 PSAa
S2. ... .Q21 PSAr
S2.Q22 SA
S2.Q16 ... S3.Q05 Prin S3.Q16 Prin S3.Q11 AP S3 ... .Q08 AP S3.Q22 ... Parallel Flaw questions: S3.Q24 Para
S2 ...