I am confused about the logic translations seen in the video explanation for a particular LR question:
**LSAT PrepTest 49, Section 4, Question 16**
Link: https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-4-question-16/
"not a problem in well-ventilated house but it is in well-insulated house" implies that a well-insulated house is not a well-ventilated house, hence D, correct? I picked E because I mistakenly read the well-ventilated as well-insulated in that a well- ...
I was revisiting some old PTs and stumbled across this question. It's giving me quite the headache. JY's explanation doesn't help at all because he assumes that the amount of correctly addressed but damaged mail is a small subset of correctly addressed ...
Why is B incorrect and E correct? I eliminated E based on the language that "even when those preferences could only be inferred" when the stimulus was really explicit.
Hi everyone! I just took five practice questions and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone has this question open or has worked on it recently, I'd greatly appreciate the help!
I selected D but the answer choice was A, I'm not ...
Wouldn't the inability to detect methane in the atmosphere (C) be the answer? The right answer (B) says that not all living beings have the ability to produce methane, but couldn't "not all" still mean that 99.9% of living beings could (and hence NOT ...
Hi! I really struggled with timing on LSAT prep test 93 Logic Game Three because of the amount of conditional statements and not knowing where to even start with inferences beyond contrapositives. Any suggestions with where to find resources on the best ...
I got stuck on this question between answer A and answer E. I went with A knowing that the 'every' in the answer would most likely be wrong. I almost selected E because it says 'they (men) fell short in all other categories' meaning men would have fallen ...
Could someone please explain why the correct answer would be E. I put B, but I honestly just guessed. I need some help wrapping my head around this question.
It's unclear to me why D assists in weakening the argument? Isn't the argument that efforts have not worked to have people recycle plastics? If so, how does it weaken the authors argument that recycling methods have improved for non-plastics? Very confused ...
Is D correct because identical twins have the same genetic information? Is this just something we are supposed to know or is the answer warranted by the passage?