HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt9 | 76 | 86 |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
| q7 | 93 | 121 |
-
Necessary and Sufficient Answer Choices in the Same QuestionCan someone point me to LSAT LR q's that are either necessary or sufficient questions types that list BOTH a necessary and sufficient answer choice? …
I think PT49 S4 Q16 does it...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-4-question-16/ -
Mislabeled as SA in Question Bank?In the Question Bank and in the LR Drill Sets (https://7sage.com/lesson/lr-drills-preptest-01-to-09/ ), **PT8.S4.Q21**. is categorized as a Sufficien…
... was a discussion about PT8.S4.Q21. (https://7sage.com/discussion ... -
Mislabeled as SA in Question Bank?In the Question Bank and in the LR Drill Sets (https://7sage.com/lesson/lr-drills-preptest-01-to-09/ ), **PT8.S4.Q21**. is categorized as a Sufficien…
Thanks! PT8.S4.Q21 has been changed from the incorrect SA label to the correct NA label. -
"Mathy" Questions drilling?Sharing this in hopes that it might be useful to some: In an effort to feel more comfortable with "mathy" questions (involving proportions, percen…
... (overgeneralization)
PT 50, S4, #22 (36)
PT ... 291) (MBT)
PT 27, S4, #14 (312) (MBT)
PT 30, S4, #22 (76) (MSS)
PT 54, S4, #24 (37)
PT 49, S4, #24 (36) (flawed)
... -
"if all and only those" -- biconditional?Hello, I was working on PT35.S4.Q11, and came across the expression "if all and only those", and it seemed to me as a biconditional indicator, bu…
... the explanation video of PT35.S4.Q11, J.Y. explains this ... -
PT7.S1.Q10 - a large group of hyperactive childrenI'd love an explanation on this one! Thanks in advance
... as "the Dramamine question"), PT25.S4.Q24, PT55.S3.Q9, PT57 ... -
Translation of "derive solely from"I have a question regarding a logical translation of "derive solely from." This is from the answer choice (D) in PT62.S4.Q15. https://7sage.com/lsat_…
... @LSATcantwin !
But PT62.S4.Q15 is a PSA question ... -
PT22.S4.Q19 - contemporary business firmsI could not find anything to prove the conclusion > few people understand current events> and did not see the flaw the LSAT makers identified. He…
Hey, I think you mis-numbered the question. PT22, S4, Q19 is a weakening question on the Iron Law of Responsibility.
Could you provide us with the right question number so we could help you out? -
Weakening questions - a strategy for harder questions?Yesterday I had the privilege of working through a problem with J.Y. It’s in here if you are curious; https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/1…
... get further clarification for PT82.S4.Q14 ?
I've been ... -
DeleteDelete
... of one another (i.e. S4, Q3). When you have a ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... />
J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Referential phrase: "otherwise"<center>:warning: <font color="red">**This post contains spoilers to PT80.S4.Q15**</font> :warning:</center> I had trouble parsing out the stimulu…
... in LG; for example, PT55.S4.Game 4's last rule ... -
RedactedRedacted
... involved flawed reasoning (e.g. S4.LR1) and were justified as ... -
PT75.S4.Q21 (G4)I don't understand how E can be the correct answer. There actually appears to be no correct answer. The LSAT relies heavily on Formal Logic and apply…
... page.
For PT75.S4.Q21 (G4), the [explanation page ... -
X can be warranted only by YHi guys, I was working through PT25/S3/Q7 when I read this phrase and wondered, "is it a biconditional?" "warranted" means "sufficient", so to re…
... # and such? PT 25, S3, Q7 is an Analytic Reasoning question ... -
How to go back to curriculumI recently watched the "Post CC Strategies" webinar and something that he had mentioned as apart of the first phase of taking PTs is that we should b…
... all the questions in PT44.S4 (Starting from Q1) and PT49 ... .S4 (Starting from Q1).
: ... -
PT28.S1.Q2 - If the economy weak, prices remain constant...I don't get why answer choices D could be true. Are you not supposed to consider the contrapositives of the answer choices or of what's in the stimul…
... : Souderton or Randsborough" game (PT34.S4.Game 4)
https://7sage ...
