Missed last time, but I'll be there this time. ReadingComp somehow went from my best to worst section and more practice doesn't seem to be making much difference.
@joy.pyles Check in with @nicole.hopkins . She loves the LSAT and readingcomp. Also, picking up a copy of "The LSAT Trainer" could help improve your approach.
... all technical words with "moonpies" and "purple monkeys." Etc. Structure is what ... you can't see the structure, replace words in stimulus with lovely ...
... too much time. also the readingcomp was totally fucked for me ... cause i did an experimental reading section and by the time ... i even got to start reading it. dont take it too ...
... that "at least" is a key word for 'Grouping Game Board ... as "sequence" and "order" being keywords for the 'Standard Sequencing Game ... if there are other identifying words or word patterns for each ... more awesome to add identifying words or word patterns to the ...
ive done it both ways. For me at least, it turns out that scribbling some keywords next to a paragraph helps, in terms of saving time and "getting it".
Got it. Not good, man. Not good. It was my first take... I will probably wait another year. Big disappointment. The whole problem was readingcomp; I don't know what the hell happened. Everything else was exactly what I expected. :/
I can't get over how helpful the 7sage community is. Thank you all for putting on these webinars. Nicole, you changed readingcomp for me on the pt 43 call yesterday. Thank you all so much!
@"Cant Get Right" @Mookittyy @MrSamIam, as of not my logic games i am getting 3 wrong, my LR I am getting between 7- 9 wrong in each section and my readingcomp I am getting 5-9 wrong.