HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| superprep | 226 | 291 |
| a | 136.2K | 436K |
| b | 10.1K | 23.1K |
| c | 6.8K | 11.6K |
| order | 4.5K | 5.3K |
| by | 26K | 34.8K |
| 7536 | 1 | 1 |
-
The Sufficient/Necessary Flaw: an approach to maximize pointsHey everyone, This post is intended to be an overview of how the sufficient/necessary flaw appears on the LSAT and how we can develop a system of att…
... thread” of the argument sentence by sentence.
The ... Scotland is not Ireland in order to draw this implied negation ... br /> Again, take a look at answer choice (C)
The ... be erroneously taking A---->B to mean B---->A
... -
PT81.S2.Q13 - A six-month public health campaignI still don't understand why A is right and C is wrong. The conclusion reads, "it's obvious that the public headed the campaign", meaning they follow…
... effect relationship, I assumed that a correct strengthener would reaffirm that ... of everything except for A and C. I wasn't sure ... anything, it weakens the argument by 'presenting an alternate cause', but ... argue if that was really b/c of the campaign or whatever ... -
PT39.3.19 - "Which can be inferred..." (Passage 3 - Blackbody objects)Link to video expl/quick view: https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-39-section-3-passage-3-questions/ My question is about the correct A/C, (A…
... about the correct A/C, (A) and an incorrect one, (B).
...
Had (A) said "radiation reflected by and radiation emitted by an object ... to be true in order for certain things to ... be literally a _black_-colored body in order to be a proper ... -
PT12.S1.Q25 - How do you diagram answer choices B and C?How do you diagram answer choices B and C? And can someone explain how and why C is a valid conclusion? A---> X---->E S--s--A A.) S--s--X B …
... choices B and C? And can someone explain how and why C is a ... valid conclusion?
A---> X ... /> S--s--A
A.) S--s--X
B
C)
D) /X--->/A
Superprep A: Section 1, Question 1 (Dieting and weight gain)So putting aside the fact that I feel like an idiot for missing question 1....why is B incorrect? When I read it the first time, I thought it was cor…
... missing question 1....why is B incorrect? When I read it ... reduced weight, wouldn't a diet be a poor option for them ... that was good enough of a reason. I do see that ... do but if answer choice C had said the word should ...PT.60.S3.Q3 - building permit cannot be obtained by Feb 1I'm literally SO confused about this question. How are you supposed to diagram this? From my understanding, "Unless A --> NOT B" is equivalent to…
... understanding, "Unless A --> NOT B" is equivalent to..."-A --> -B"....right?
A OR B --> NOT C" would be diagrammed like "-A OR -B --> -C ... the building permit is obtained by Feb 1 OR some of ...Is every assumption the argument makes a NA?I think I reasoned my way though this as I wrote it out. Figured I’d post it in case anyone might be helped by it. Please point out any issues. I …
... case anyone might be helped by it. Please point out any ... assumption the argument **actually makes** a NA?
My ... . Eg
P: A
C:B
A->B is the NA as ... assumption argument actually makes is a NA.
Is ...Mistake by LSAC? Pizzerias LR Sufficient Assumption Question.Explanation (2 mins): https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-40-section-1-question-21/ Question 21 on PrepTest 40 Section 1: Pizzerias are the …
... />
First sentence gives: A -> B (Restaurants that record -> Pizzerias ... /> Answer choice E provides: A -> C (Restaurants that record -> utilize ... assumption provided by the answer, we only get B some C. We can ...LR Study Guides ThreadI was wondering if we could upload our study guides in this post for those taking the June and upcoming LSATs can always come back to this.
... suggests that A→B and that C did NOT cause A and B. C isn’t ... necessary to establish that A causes B, but ... that A caused B or B caused A; it’s something else that caused A by ... - Check to see if the order is reversal: Causes must precede ...Parallel FlawOkay, So I have watched all of JY Videos on Parallel Flaw but keep missing the correct answer. I feel like my challenge has been correct diagraming ?…
... the contrapositive of A-->B.
Here is a great example ... be explained"
Answer choice C just says "entity X 'has ... something cannot be explained by something else, A just gets the two ... something's in the wrong order.How to improve reading speed on RC?Hi everyone! So RC is my strength and I usually only miss 8-9 questions on the whole section and that is mostly because I run out of time! If I h…
... passages.
@c.janson35 @"J.Y. Ping"
@nye8870 said:
@c.janson35 Thanks. I agree fully ... others too) is that [b] in order to achieve that deeper ... the questions move by quicker, I realistically need a lot more ...PT46.S3.Q24 - editorialist: despite the importancehttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-46-section-3-question-24/ This sufficient assumption question really has me thrown. I've read the Manhattan…
... not existing. So, in order to prove this question, we ... belief in it
C:Money does not exist.
by POE.
B: mistaken beliefs? that adds a new ... variable. eliminate
C: practical ...June 2016 LSATWho else is going to take the June 2016 LSAT? I'd love to connect with you. :)
... LSAT Superprep (A and B - haven't done C yet) and by far ... my worst section is Logic Games. Improved from a ... second one with about a month of studying in ... getting those suckers down to a t.
... If your eyes need a break from the computer ...Best logic games to "master"Is there a list anywhere of challenging logic games (of all types) that are important to know inside and out, as part of LG prep? Or is there a wa…
... " ? What is PT B? Perhaps a silly question from a newb like me ... />
This list was compiled by one of the Sages I ... ://www.amazon.com/Official-LSAT-SuperPrep-Champion-Prep/dp/0979305063/ref ... the SuperPrep series above where you'll also find PT A and C ...Some statementsHey im still confused after reviewing the CC again I know a some statement can be reversibly read but is there a way to negate it? For example:…
... of /R was rhetorical in order to show what is possible ... ;/B
AsomeC negated = A-->/C
B-->C negated = Bsome/C ... we can't negate it by saying some cats don't ... tails because that is allowed by our original statement and therefore ...PT2.S2.Q2 - Campers at Camp Winnehatchee with Ann and BillCan someone please explain this to me? Why is the correct answer choice E? <strong>Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# -…
In order for Bill's response to ... />
A, B, and C are incorrect because they "leave room" by using the ...Navigating the SiteHi, So I'm new here and I can't seem to navigate the site. 1. I'm trying to take a prep test at my own pace but selecting the sections I would …
... have answered your questions in order below.
1: ... do it:
a. Navigate to Problem Sets.https ... /> b. Filter by PrepTests on the "PrepTests To Show" area
c. Filter by ... after you have finished taking a PrepTest or Problem Set. ...WebinarA little while ago I was on here and people were talking about "nicole.hopkins" webinar on her reading comprehension strategy. Does anybody have the …
... down piece by piece!
_"In order to deduce a valid ... ;B some C. In this case the existential is preceded by the ... B and C since every A is a B and _at least one_ A is also a C ... this answers your question, which by the way is a great question!PT31.S2.Q19 - "If the flowers Drew received..."**#help** **Question link:** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-31-section-2-question-19/ Ok, I'm all on board with the correct answer an…
... would for any A/C in order to analyze its ... your example, b/c it really provides a much clearer ... by my reasoning that we **cannot** eliminate this A/C ... in the future," but rather b/c:
-1- ... delivery person botched it b/c he forgot to include ...Conditional statementI have a random question LMAO! If in a grouping logic game the rule is: if W then T or F does that mean that if I have T or F in the yes/in group, …
... which we cannot assume, b/c there's nothing in the ... is really a nested conditional (parentheses necessary because order of operation ... true (necessary statement of a conditional satisfied). Since (W ... conditional has been satisfied (by virtue of W --> ...Blind Review feels like an inefficient way to study (50% extra time, scoring ~170 right now)I'm 6 months into studying full-time, and I've been using 7Sage. My first LSAT sitting will be in September. My goal score is 175+. I've hit 170 a…
... to further your understanding in order to be capable of such ... it's because of reasons A, B, or C as you mention, they ... RC, which presumably get exacerbated by techniques that the test writers ... vice versa for questions solved by POE. And finally, the ...What is PrepTest A and where are the explanations to those questions?Hi! I recently did the drill for the weakening section and saw that two of my questions were pulled from PrepTest A and didn't have explanation video…
... your other question - PrepTests A, B, and C are old February tests that ... together in the LSAC's SuperPrep book (and in the same ... vein, C2 is from SuperPrep 2). They're not special ... started releasing tests in numerical order (for example, Feb 96 would ...A confusion relates to Lawgic and Sufficent Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... . "A-->C + A -->B"
2. "A-->C + A -most->B"
3. "A-->C + A ... some B ... "B some C" relationship. Though the first part is the same "A-->C ...A specific Lawgic Confusion and Assumption QuestionsI am very confused with a specific relationship between universal quantifiers and existential quantifiers. This confusion becomes annoying in Assumpt…
... . "A-->C + A -->B"
2. "A-->C + A -most->B"
3. "A-->C + A ... some B ... "B some C" relationship. Though the first part is the same "A-->C ...Logic games problemDo any of you sometimes hesitate to go to the next problem when you have the same letter answer twice in a row? I sometimes loose a couple of seconds…
... answer twice in a row? I sometimes loose a couple of seconds ... see for example two A's in a row. Any advice? I ... waste time by going back and quickly looking over B,C,D and ... E, when I know A is the ...PT16.S2.Q24 - uplandian supreme courtCan someone give me some feed back on this? The reasoning denies a conclusion in order to show a premise is false. Is that an acceptable method of ar…
... The reasoning denies a conclusion in order to show a premise is false ... that conditionally, if A->B, then negation B = negation A, but does that ... in sentence 1 is false by showing that the conclusion it ... 2 is false. Is that a valid form of argumentation? ..."Which of the following could be a complete and accurate" LG Questions.Hi, I'm always confused about these questions. I don't understand if the question is asking you all the potential objects that can belong in the …
... the following could be a complete and accurate list ... br />
A. X
B. X, Z
C. X,Y,Z ... E. Z
A, B, and E can be eliminated ... leading me to answer choice C.
I ... ?
Thanks a lot to whomever responds.MSS / WeakeningRight now I'm in the process of going through old material to improve my less-than-stellar LR sections. It's interesting how going through old ma…
... like peppers.
A) sometimes Jane likes cheese pizza ... .
B) Jane always buys cheese and ... LSAT questions. But, obviously A is correct. Why? Because ... Answer choice C - hard surfaces enhance a runner's speed by making it ...Prep Test #43, S#3, Q#23 - Each of many different human hormonesMain Conclusion question. Chose A, however the OA is B. Confused. Here is my reasoning... A. Labeled this as the main conclusion. It is verb…
... />
Chose A, however the OA is B. Confused. Here is ... .
B. Labeled this as a premise. I read like ... first sentence and is introduced by the phrase "The reason for ... me this always signals a premise
C. Another premise and ...Formal LogicOkay guys, this is pretty much my dumb down version of explaining some formal logic based on my knowledge. I believe this is something that needs to …
... to be really understood in order to improve in logic ...
If A-> Not B
If B-> Not A -------> That ... present
*A CAN be by itself
* B CANNOT! I REPEAT ...
