... back up and the study scheduler v2 saysto take the June 2007 diagnostic ... however I plan on taking the ... start doing the lessons and save the new format PTs to do once ... . My plan is to start studying the week of July 22nd ...
... to be that for many of the harder questions, the LSAT asks you to decide on the ... talking. The unspoken conclusion we are supposed to draw for ourselves (and to get the right ... . Of course, to draw that conclusion, we need to make the assumption that (we ...
... down strategies for attacking each question type and trying to memorize them ... , which work for me. For instance, forWeakeningQuestions, I negate theconclusion and find the answer choice ...
... down to two answer choices and then use the negation process. Forthe most ... the game. Maybe I misinterpreted a Sub conclusionfor a main conclusion or something to ... post from 7sage on NA questions. Can be found here: http ...
... to buy the logic game bible just to get the categories. If your simply looking for ... />
Note: the name categories are the same as from logic game bible, which ...
Yeah Flaw/Weakening question types seem to be thequestions I miss the most. I ... downloaded the Cambridge bundle forweakeningquestions, and ... I'll probably also purchase the flawed reasoning bundle. I wish 7Sage ...
... addition to that, going through the past exams, picking out the flaw questions, and ... saying "the wrong answer choices are correct answer choices for other questions"? That ... course, one must always identify the premise, conclusion, and major assumptions in ...
Leelisee - thinking of the "anti-conclusion" really helps clarify my thinking. ... reading the answer choices backwards forweakeningquestions: from E to A. I figure the LSAT ... writers must have a deliberate reason forthe ...
... for that particular question even then your reasoning should follow that of the ... question... your job is to trace that reasoning... sure you might get ... ought to review because chances are... you haven't got the right reasoning ...
... :
In particular, he says when learning to ride a backwards bike ... over all the material and know what to do - but for some reason ... "The Power of Habit" that's been on my to-read list for ... a while and it's ALL ABOUT the power of habits to ...
... of the T14." Thereasoning is if you're going to law school to purely ... schools forthe best and the brightest. However, whatever the demand may be for law ... different scenario for recruiting. The upper hand still belongs tothe person behind the desk ...
... ... opened up. Forweakeningquestions I found it easier to... when you're ... stuck... really write out what theconclusion is, what the ... yourself: "Does this answer make theconclusion less likely to be true?"
... , then "any" wouldn't be thelogical indicator. You can't really ... I outlined. So thelogical indicator would have to be another word. That ... />
Have can be a logical indicator like this:
@jyang72 just approach those similar to an LR question: look for reasons why the choices you didn't select are incorrect for those questions, and provide reasoning why the choice you are selecting is correct. That should suffice.
... for me to miss a question that I didn't circle on the ... wordings of the answer options and the stimulus in parallel reasoningquestions, or simply ... against that question type (for instance, I used to hate PSAs, but ...
Most weird exam for me ever. I am usually strong on thelogicalreasoning sections ... , I don't know what the deal was. I am not ... reading comprehension. But here is the weird part...I am more ... performance than LR. I thought the wxyz question was even easy.
... referred to as Flaw/Descriptive Weakeningquestions. They are looking for an articulation of the ... be true in order fortheconclusion of the argument to be true. It must ...
... is why do we have to do the LR practice sets, reading ... check the answers? Because it saysto do the practice problems timed before the blind ... a second chance to have a crack at the question and see ...
I see that the discussion forum title says that this is for PT48, but the heading right above the GoToMeeting link says it's PT46 (Saturday, Feb 20th at 8PM ET: PT46). To be clear, this is for 48, right?