HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| what | 49.4K | 75.6K |
| lesson | 2.9K | 5.2K |
| existential | 164 | 242 |
| quantifiers | 147 | 224 |
| discussed | 478 | 500 |
-
MBT, SA, ParalellSo the common denominator between all 3 of these question types is..logic. I have been through the curriculum multiple times. I know how to translat…
... memorized the indicators. I understand existential quantifiers.
> Why am i ... a MBT question, for example, what is causing the problem? More ... -
17 point improvement - thank you JY and 7Sage!So I originally sent a thank you directly to 7Sage, and Akiko encouraged me to post about it here in the hopes of helping/encouraging others. I wi…
... said:
> @"Watermelon Otter" What were some of the things ... , so I'm wondering what some of your specific tips ... LR is your weakness. What helped me was doing tons ... logic indicator words like "unless"), existential quantifiers, and also the basic math ... -
Anyone else having trouble with RC questions asking you to infer?When I started my LSAT journey, RC was the section I was least concerned about. I finished all the passages, and would get maybe -5. It was something…
... /> > Fact Test! That’s what always helps me
lesson it's discussed in that would be ... -
⚖ Official July 2019 LSAT Discussion Thread ⚖Hey 7Sagers, Here's the official July 2019 LSAT Discussion Thread. <center><font color="red">**Please keep all discussions of the July 2019 LS…
... / could go back in time, what do you wish you had ... /> • Knowing your logical indicators and existential quantifiers was very helpful for moving ... -
LR Exisential Quantifiers. Should I skip this section?Feeling quiet overwhelmed. I am preparing for the January and Feb LSAT and I cannot for the life of me understand exisential quantifiers and sections…
... break.
>
> What exactly are you stuck on ... it with you.
Existential quantifiers and everything after that.... literally. -
LR Exisential Quantifiers. Should I skip this section?Feeling quiet overwhelmed. I am preparing for the January and Feb LSAT and I cannot for the life of me understand exisential quantifiers and sections…
... going to need to understand existential quantifiers before going into the logic ... testing (as are the universal quantifiers). I would spend the time ... what LG's require knowledge of existential quantifiers? I don't believe knowing existential quantifiers ... -
LR Exisential Quantifiers. Should I skip this section?Feeling quiet overwhelmed. I am preparing for the January and Feb LSAT and I cannot for the life of me understand exisential quantifiers and sections…
... going to need to understand existential quantifiers before going into the logic ... what LG's require knowledge of existential quantifiers? I don't believe knowing existential quantifiers ... i dont believe you need existential quantifiers for LG
... -
Sufficient & Necessary ConditionsHi everyone, I'm currently reviewing PT 37 that I completed yesterday and I'm on section 2 #12. Even watching JY's video, I'm still a little confu…
... . Anyway, I was just wondering-- what do you do when you ... feel like there was a lesson on this or that it ... know or let me know what lesson it was in, that'd ... -
The indicator "even if"Hi, I know that there are many words that indicate what groups (universal quantifiers) you are in. Among them, where does the word "even if" belong t…
Hi, I know that there are many words that indicate what groups (universal quantifiers) you are in. Among them, where does the word "even if" belong to? Thanks. -
Understanding why "some are not" is the negation of "all"In the existential quantifiers lessons, JY explains how to negate statements with the universal quantifier "all." The conclusion was that "some are n…
In the existential quantifiers lessons, JY explains how to ... -
MBT, SA, ParalellSo the common denominator between all 3 of these question types is..logic. I have been through the curriculum multiple times. I know how to translat…
... memorized the indicators. I understand existential quantifiers.
Why am i struggling ... -
Syllabus Format Change?Has anyone noticed that the Syllabus looks different? The stars aren't yellow anymore, and it's hard to tell which lessons I have already done becaus…
I'm seeing it too...it took me a while to realize what lesson I'm on because everything has a check mark next to it!! -
ValiditySo the valid argument forms are used for MBT, SA questions and logic games only or am I missing something else? Also what about existential quantifie…
The valid argument forms and the existential quantifiers can appear anywhere on the LSAT, not only in particular types of questions. Sure, they may appear more frequently in certain types of questions, but it's not a hard and fast rule. -
No contrapositive for some.When some equals 100%, why wouldn't the counter positive be valid?
... the Schrodinger's cat of existential quantifiers. Without peering inside the box ... -
What is the negation of "not many"?How do you negate "not many"? To me, you can't just dropped the "not". Here's my thought process: "Not many" seems to be the same as "some not…
... attempt to contort natural language quantifiers, such as "most, many, more ... doomed project because the universal/existential quantifiers ("all"/"some") of first-order ... syntactic behavior of all generalized quantifiers.
Here is a ... -
LSAT MapWould it be possible to have a copy of the LSAT map? It's a great reference, however I would really like to have a PDF version printed so I can refe…
AH that one! I'm not sure if we have one but if we do, it'll be in the first lesson that introduces it. I can't remember off the top of my head what lesson that is right now either, sorry. -
Does the word "can" indicate a relationship?Hi all, Just a quick question, does the word "can" indicate a relationship or is it indicate like "could", "might" a probability? For instanc…
... it. With both universal and existential quantifiers, we know that something is ... -
some and most/Q-->/D D-->W in the 7sage lesson, the teacher said /Q-->/D and /W-->/D, thus, there's no inference made. However, isn't we also can do it like D--…
... . Then the question asks you what can be inferred. You can ... attendees.
Depending on what lesson you're referring to, I ... -
Question on contrapositive for some and iffHi all! So I need some clarifications...! Please help! Contrapositive for "some" doesn't exist because it's reversible. A <-s-> /B (Some A …
... equivalent. None of the existential quantifiers (some and most) can ... it is using universal quantifiers and doing so would ... **can't** contrapose when existential quantifiers (some and most) are ... **can** contrapose when universal quantifiers are present -
Question on contrapositive for some and iffHi all! So I need some clarifications...! Please help! Contrapositive for "some" doesn't exist because it's reversible. A <-s-> /B (Some A …
... inherently equivalent. None of the existential quantifiers (some and most) can be ... you **can't** contrapose when existential quantifiers (some and most) are present ... ; you **can** contrapose when universal quantifiers are present
... -
PT22.S2.Q25 - a recent survey showed thatHey, guys! Can you help me make sense of my reasoning for selecting this answer choice, if that makes sense?! Lol Ok so I chose D but I get why B …
... a different regard than what's already been discussed.
I ... as a reference point on what I'm not understanding.
Applying the skipping strategy to studying CCJY always emphasizes the skipping strategy when taking timed PTs, but I think this can help with Core Curriculum as well. When you don't understand…
Totally agree. I just went through existential quantifiers again since about 2m ago and it was so much clearer this time around :) also after BR re-doing the curriculum with common question types that I get wrong is something I am implementing now.Any suggestions for parallel reasoning??Does anyone have suggestions for how to approach parallel method of reasoning questions under time pressure? I feel like these questions in particula…
... conditional logic and they had existential quantifiers. Little tips and tricks like ...Prioritization / Limited Time to SpendGood Afternoon! I previously took the LSAT last August and received a 166 and am signed up to take the LSAT again on October 3rd. I want to impro…
... recommend going over the universal quantifiers, existential quantifiers, and the advanced logical indicators ...Key Lessons to Review before Nov LSATHi all, I was wondering what are some KEY lessons/videos/sections in the syllabus that I should definitely watch to help keep my mind refreshed and a…
... logic, causation logic, Universal and Existential quantifiers. Also, if you're scoring ...Bad idea to do the 7sage syllabus out of order?I've been going in sort of a random order, because 1) I don't have time to go through eveeeeerything before test day, and 2) I'm trying to really foc…
You should be fine doing it out of order, I did it and I think it was fine. Just be sure not to skip over the important content: introduction to logic, existential quantifiers, causation logic, the LG cc and RC memory method.LR Exisential Quantifiers. Should I skip this section?Feeling quiet overwhelmed. I am preparing for the January and Feb LSAT and I cannot for the life of me understand exisential quantifiers and sections…
... going to need to understand existential quantifiers before going into the logic ... testing (as are the universal quantifiers). I would spend the time ...WebinarA little while ago I was on here and people were talking about "nicole.hopkins" webinar on her reading comprehension strategy. Does anybody have the …
... deduce a valid inference, the existential quantifiers need to precede the universal ...WebinarA little while ago I was on here and people were talking about "nicole.hopkins" webinar on her reading comprehension strategy. Does anybody have the …
... valid inference, the existential quantifiers need to precede the ... example of an existential quantifier preceding a universal ... first idea of existential preceding universal quantifiers. This won ... these examples include existential quantifiers we cannot say that ...Easiest way to increase Logical Reasoning Score for JanHi, I’m currently at -10 in LR and want to get to at least -5 before the Jan exam to reach my goal. What would be the easiest and quickest metho…
... . There was no mention of "existential quantifiers" in The LSAT Demon/The ...
