For those of you who have done LR questions from PT's 1-16 and also PT's 35 and above, do you feel that the older PT's LR questions are a bit more difficult or not as straight forward? What are your opinions?
... games? I'm foolproofing PT1-35 and I hit the stretch ... of PT10-16 and there was one pattern ... 've came across in PT1-35 had me paralyzed when I ...
The only explanations missing for 1-35 are the LR explanations from 1-16. Everything else is there. You can access them via the method @"GSU Hopeful" described.
I recommend what i did after fool proofing PT 1-35 which was taking them in section format under time and watched J.Y videos again this time primarily for learning time saving strategies he mentions. I improved from -16 to -0.
... the games from PT 1-35? It is possible to achieve ... on LG. I started with -16 on LG and ended up ... LG sections of PT 1-35 under time and watch J ...
... the games from PT 1-35? It is possible to achieve ... on LG. I started with -16 on LG and ended up ... LG sections of PT 1-35 under time and watch J ...
... LR sections from PT 1-35 and do them individually while ... student and started LG with -16 and managed to reach -2 ... LG sections of PT 1-35 under time and watch J ...
... LR sections from PT 1-35 and do them individually while ... student and started LG with -16 and managed to reach -2 ... LG sections of PT 1-35 under time and watch J ...
... />
If you divide the 35 minutes up by the number ... hardest one. Now you have 35 minutes for 3 games. This ... scenario you'd then answer 16 questions with 100% accuracy. That ...
... to be ranked 14 vs 16, but I wouldn't extrapolate ... 79.5%, and Northeastern's 35.3%. Those are huge differences ... wonder how many of the 35% employed from Northeastern are from ...
... to be ranked 14 vs 16, but I wouldn't extrapolate ... 79.5%, and Northeastern's 35.3%. Those are huge differences ... wonder how many of the 35% employed from Northeastern are from ...