LSAT 119 – Section 3 – Question 06

LSAT 119 - Section 3 - Question 06

June 2005

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Request new explanation

Target time: 1:27

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question
QuickView		 Type Tags Answer
Choices		 Curve Question
Difficulty		 Psg/Game/S
Difficulty		 Explanation
PT119 S3 Q06
+LR
Weaken +Weak
Causal Reasoning +CausR
A
6%
155
B
1%
152
C
1%
150
D
80%
165
E
12%
159
139
149
159
 +Medium 145.195 +SubsectionEasier

Heavy salting of Albritten’s roads to melt winter ice and snow began about 20 years ago. The area’s groundwater now contains approximately 100 milligrams of dissolved salt per liter. Groundwater in a nearby, less highly urbanized area, where little salt is used and where traffic patterns resemble those of Albritten 20 years ago, contains only about 10 milligrams of dissolved salt per liter. Since water that contains 250 or more milligrams of dissolved salt per liter tastes unacceptably salty, continuing the salting of Albritten’s roads at its present rate will render Albritten’s groundwater unpalatable within the next few decades.

Summarize Argument
Albritten’s groundwater will be unsuitable for consumption in the coming decades if its roads continue to be heavily salted. This is because water with more than 250 milligrams of dissolved salt per liter is unpalatable and currently, Albritten’s groundwater has about 100 mg of dissolved salt per liter. In comparison, the groundwater in a nearby area that isn’t heavily salted has about 10 mg of dissolved salt per liter.

Notable Assumptions
The author assumes that the heavy salting of Albritten’s roads caused an increase in the salt concentration of its groundwater. By doing so, the author also assumes that the groundwater did not always have a high amount of dissolved salt per liter and that the cause of an increase is not some other factor (such as the highly urbanized nature of Albritten or traffic—two characteristics that the other area also lacks).

A
Even water that contains up to 5,000 milligrams of dissolved salt per liter is safe to drink.
This does not affect the argument. The author is not concerned with whether the water is safe to drink, but with whether the water is palatable (i.e., whether it tastes unacceptably salty).
B
The concentration of dissolved salt in Albritten’s groundwater is expected to reach 400 milligrams per liter within a few decades.
This strengthens the argument. It reinforces the idea that Albritten’s groundwater will become increasingly salty in the coming decades and thus, will become unpalatable. 400 mg per liter is much higher than 250, which is the concentration at which water becomes unpalatable.
C
Salting icy roads is the simplest way to prevent accidents on those roads.
This does not affect the argument. The author is not concerned with why the salting occurs, but with the consequences of the heavy salting.
D
Albritten’s groundwater contained roughly 90 milligrams of dissolved salt per liter 20 years ago.
This weakens the argument. It exploits the author’s assumption that the salt concentration of Albritten’s groundwater has increased because of heavy salting. (D) says the groundwater has always been salty—much saltier than the nearby area that does not heavily salt its roads.
E
Salting of Albritten’s roads is likely to decrease over the next few decades.
This does not affect the argument. The author only makes an argument about the consequences if Albritten’s roads continue to be heavily salted. The roads not being salted at the current rate is outside the scope of the author’s argument and is not relevant.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 119 Explanations

Section 1 - Reading Comprehension

Section 2 - Logical Reasoning

Section 3 - Logical Reasoning

Section 4 - Logical Reasoning

Get full LSAT course

Leave a Reply