Subscription pricing
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-10/
I got this one right almost instinctively (I didn't map this out), but I have a question about the phrase "can best be explained if" in the second sentence of the stimulus.
.
.
[Phenomenon] The rate is 450 times/second.
[Theory] The rate of 450 times/second can be best explained if the ring has a radius of 49km.
Assuming that the theory is correct, we can conclude that the ring has a radius of 49km.
.
To diagram [Theory] using Group 1 Translation:
・The ring of gas has a radius of 49km —> The rate of 450 times/second can best be explained
.
But is this correct way to diagram?
.
.
When I read this stimulus, I actually understood it as
・the rate of 450 times/second ---> the ring has a radius of 49km.
・The can ring maintain an orbit so close (49km) to a black hole —> the black hole was spinning
C: the black hole was spinning (Answer Choice (C))
.
.
Is my understanding correct? If so, how should we understand the phrase "can best be explained if"?
Let me know what you guys think :) Any help is appreciated!
0
5 comments
Thank you @ji330 and @hakasopa71825 !!
・the rate of 450 times/second ---> the ring has a radius of 49km.
・The can ring maintain an orbit so close (49km) to a black hole —> the black hole was spinning
the phrase "can best be explained" = "only explanation". Therefore, making your diagram above correct.
If we don’t make this faulty assumption, I don’t even think we can get to the correct answer lol…..
I haven't done PT 60 yet, but I just had a look on the question. I also got it right with intuition. Those physical words prevent me from understanding what it is talking about.
To diagram [Theory] using Group 1 Translation:
・The ring of gas has a radius of 49km —> The rate of 450 times/second can best be explained
.
But is this correct way to diagram?
.
.
When I read this stimulus, I actually understood it as
・the rate of 450 times/second ---> the ring has a radius of 49km.
・The can ring maintain an orbit so close (49km) to a black hole —> the black hole was spinning
C: the black hole was spinning (Answer Choice (C))
I agree with your diagraming. Your understanding when you read the stimulus is based on the assumption that the theory is right, which is asked by the question stem. However, your diagram using group 1 translation is not based on that assumption. I believe that is where the difference comes from.
Is my understanding correct? If so, how should we understand the phrase "can best be explained if"?
I think the phrase actually means "if the theory is right". If a theory cannot explain a phenomenon that is in its scope, the theory is seriously challenged.
Hope this helps! :blush:
@7sagestudentservices said:
Bumping this to the top.
https://media.giphy.com/media/w3tB37s83jrXO/giphy.gif
Bumping this to the top.