Self-study
Trying to find some Boston area LSAT camaraderie!
griffinclairee631
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
griffinclairee631
Tuesday, Apr 15 2025
Kevin's Zelda treasure chest comment makes me want to cancel my 7 Sage subscription and replay BOTW
griffinclairee631
Wednesday, Apr 09 2025
#feedback it is confusing to me when JY edits the stimulus or answer choices to be correct in a different hypothetical. Makes the modules longer and hard to follow what we actually missed about the question right in front of us. Is it just me?
griffinclairee631
Sunday, Apr 06 2025
getting questions right based on vibes rather than by using the Lawgic correctly
griffinclairee631
Sunday, Apr 06 2025
Shallow dip lessons were actually such a great strategy. Not possible for all Q types, but would love more straight forward lessons like this! #feedback
griffinclairee631
Wednesday, Apr 02 2025
JY we know you had to google intrinsic brightness too, don't pretend
griffinclairee631
Wednesday, Mar 26 2025
Is this not just a sufficient assumption question??? #feedback
griffinclairee631
Wednesday, Mar 26 2025
For strengthen questions, I've been looking for new ideas introduced in the conclusion not addressed in the premises or a premise not addressed by the conclusion. The link is usually there.
For this one, the conclusion says that the data for the weed killer is probably misleading. There is nothing about data in the premises so we need to 'add a premise' that reinforces misleading data.
Premises also mention different kinds of soil conditions that favor one type of weed killer to another. Not doing that in a study would make for some misleading data so I chose B
I am not a teacher and everyones brains work differently but I hope this helps someone!
When the curve goes all the way to 180 you know the question is evil