Grouping in wood as a "plant" is maybe the most bad faith association I've seen while studying. Like c'mon.

I'm trying to get faster so I just ripped B after 40 seconds and went to BR. Did BR for 2 and got B again so I was -1:30, so pretty content with this one.

@ErikaMartinez99 My understanding of the course is that mapping it out is supposed to help develop the instinct needed. There's nowhere near enough time to map out every question on the test. I'm in a similar spot and I think we both are able to instinctually hunt the correct answer.

3/5 but got to 5/5 on BR

@MnM Trust the instinct. You can easily spend another 15-20 seconds going over answers again and end up on the same one. Rip it and stick it.

@Twills Well it seems like you're missing the main conclusion.

So, is the moral of this lesson to say that if we could run a perfect experiment to back up our casual statements then they would be stronger? That seemed pretty self-explanatory.

3/3. +34 on 1st, +7 on 2nd, +10 on 3rd.

I can't tell if I'm not smart enough to understand what they're explaining or I'm smart enough and they're just overexplaining it.

5/5 LFG

5th one violates Genva convention.

Got 4/5 on all examples. Missed the first one but learned from what I did wrong and used that to get the rest of them right.

Got all three. Went over on time on all three, but not by a ton.

@je332650 Exactly what I thought too.