Let's say there are 2 As that exist. So we know, all those As are Bs. But what if there are 50 Bs in total? So those 2 As are only a small amount. Then, even if most Bs are Cs, those 2 Bs that are also As could be part of the "most" that are Cs or not. It's unknown.
Sorry, I can't really understand what you are writing.
Were you meaning to write as below?
A → B
B -m→ C
A → B
B ←some→ C
And what would you like to "solve" from this?
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
3 comments
No, you cannot infer that from the first example.
Let's say there are 2 As that exist. So we know, all those As are Bs. But what if there are 50 Bs in total? So those 2 As are only a small amount. Then, even if most Bs are Cs, those 2 Bs that are also As could be part of the "most" that are Cs or not. It's unknown.
@akikookmt881 Yes that's what I meant. Sorry if I confused you.
I just know that
A → B
B →m→ C
cannot be A → m → C
A → B
B →some→ C
cannot be A → s → C
I want to know if you can get A → s → C from first diagram
@akikookmt881 said:
Can you solve this below?
A - B
Most B - C
A- B
Some B - C
Hey @akikookmt881,
Sorry, I can't really understand what you are writing.
Were you meaning to write as below?
A → B
B -m→ C
A → B
B ←some→ C
And what would you like to "solve" from this?