Subscription pricing
do you think the risks of this new format outweigh any potential cons? like no in person test date for a while or whatever
And if u were planning to take april will you take the flex?
0
do you think the risks of this new format outweigh any potential cons? like no in person test date for a while or whatever
And if u were planning to take april will you take the flex?
7 comments
I really don't think we have enough information from LSAC yet to make an informed decision. It is very frustrating, because there's a very real possibility that we won't get this information by the time at which we have to decide to defer.
Maybe it would be helpful to ask LSAC if the flex test counts toward the limit of 3 tests per year. For those are considering taking it and have the time/money for a retake but don't want to "waste" a test sitting
Not sure. I need more information first, especially about the scoring.
@68326 you are right
Im reading it as it is three 35 minute sections in its entirety. So minus two sections...so we take 3 rather than 5 sections. Am I reading it wrong or is this right?
I’m gonna flex on flex
I do think that this is the best possible solution. I am sure that there are risks involved, but I initially wanted to take the March administration and then the April after that. I want to be able to submit my applications as early as possible in the cycle for 2021 and I want to get the LSAT behind me so that I can focus on my admissions essays. Given that I have no idea when an in-person LSAT administration will be feasible again, I think that the LSAT-flex is the best that can be made of a bad situation. However, I am very interested to hear what other people think on this matter!