A while ago I remember reading a post somewhere that talked about ways to increase your reading ability with respect to the lsat. The main takeaway was of course to take pt and drill. However someone had mentioned that reading certain types of supplemental publications could also help. The only recommendation I remember was The Economist; can anyone suggest other sources?

0

8 comments

  • Thursday, May 14 2020

    Though it's a work in progress.

    0
  • Thursday, May 14 2020

    @doneill3389668, Rereading stuff has helped me.

    0
  • Wednesday, May 13 2020

    @annekevermaak371 Thanks for the recommendation! I tried find a pdf of it online to no avail - luckily I found "Informal Logic: A pragmatic approach" by the same author through my schools library. It's pretty good so far.

    0
  • Wednesday, May 13 2020

    I've subscribed to Arts & Letters Daily (if you want practice with humanities based readings) and I also really like The Atlantic.

    2
  • Wednesday, May 13 2020

    If you have substantial time before your set test date, I have an awesome reading list that can help. It can help you become familiar with complex language, ideas, and heavy use of referential phrases. However, if you have 4 months or less, just do LSAT material. I wanted to develop reading skills without burning preptests. So, I found authors (of law and philosophy) which help with this. I don't want to leave the reading list here, but if any one is interested they can message me.

    1
  • Wednesday, May 13 2020

    I need help with QUICKLY rephrasing the premise, conclusion in my brain and then making a QUICK assumption. It's taking me far too long to do that.

    1
  • Wednesday, May 13 2020

    As far as improving our ability to analyze arguments on LR and RC you're correct in my estimation in your assertion that previous LSAT materials will be your best bet.

    As far as supplemental material I would suggest just reading more and asking yourself questions about the material you have read: main point, supporting premises, context, assumptions, fallacies etc. Of course this is difficult for novels etc, but novels can often provide us with the opportunity for a close reading/expansion of vocabulary, referential phrasing practice etc.. So this is the first skill we can pull from outside material.

    The second skill we could pull from outside material is just being aware of different types of research and stories even vaguely.

    I have a running list of articles and topics that I have a feeling the LSAT will probably eventually make questions about that I share with my students. Here is one example from the NY Times about insects that learn "logic"

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/science/paper-wasps-logic-test.html

    This article has the makings of an LR question all over it imo! lol

    Lastly, whenever I have a chance I recommend Douglas Walton's book "Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation" as I am absolutely convinced that the LSAT writers have read this book.

    2
  • Wednesday, May 13 2020

    Scientific American may be one. Also, you might find the recent Powerscore podcast on RC helpful.

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?