Hey guys!
Since they are getting rid of LG come August 2024, they are completely revamping the logic reasoning questions. They will be much tougher, and some of the questions will have hints of LG in them too. I just took the February 2024 lsat, and much of the Logic reasoning games were way tougher than anything I have ever experienced, in terms of LR. January 2024, and my february 2024 test takers seem to concur with this.
All of that being said, how should we go about studying for these revamped Logic reasoning questions? Does the 7sage V2 already have us covered? Does the V2 already have study materials for this evolved version of LR??
0
11 comments
@andbalis267 Took it in August and I might have experienced something like this, but that might also have just been a single difficult test.
Did anyone who took in August or September experience this?
@andbalis267 said:
LSAC official says this isn't true: https://www.reddit.com/r/LSAT/comments/1avud0y/addressing_the_august_2024_and_beyond_lsat_rumors
I can't access this link, can you resend it
I have heard rumors about new type of LR that in experimental section of recent test added LR with games which sounds like hybrid of LR and LG.
@andbalis267eggy car said:
LSAC official says this isn't true: https://www.reddit.com/r/LSAT/comments/1avud0y/addressing_the_august_2024_and_beyond_lsat_rumors/
Hope this is not true!
LSAC official says this isn't true: https://www.reddit.com/r/LSAT/comments/1avud0y/addressing_the_august_2024_and_beyond_lsat_rumors/
"They are completely revamping LR questions." Source?
@mytkim79858 said:
What do you mean "Logic reasoning games....in terms of LR"?
They probably just mean more questions involving conditional logic and needing to chain things together or translate
What do you mean "Logic reasoning games....in terms of LR"?
I'm glad there were LG on my test, at least as a break from so much reading haha. Though I would say there were a few odd bones on there. Not sure how much detail we're allowed to get into from the LSAC.
oh god I hope this isn't true