Ah yes. Damn their trickery!

Thanks :)

consider from the perspective of race.

I can't even express how amazing 7Sage is. Without this, I would have NO chance on the LSAT. I just cannot believe how much effort has been put into this site. It is so well done. THANK YOU.

doesn't "one" refer to a human agent??

our species favours monogamous families LOLLLLLL

I have the same question. Or should we just pick one method and use it consistently?

so far this method is looking amazing.

if opbjectivity is an "ideal" wouldn't that imply that few historians could achieve it? Or would rejecting answer A be an example of being aggressive in selecting answer choices?

Sorry everyone.

Yesterday was not a good day.

My apologies.

You are so right, yet that is so hard to do!

This is sooo helpful!

For some stupid reason I often hit the check mark instead of the next arrow. I wish there was a way to get back to the passage after making that mistake. Instead I have to start all over again with another passage. Would it be possible to add a back button? Thanks.

Here's a helpful tip for pronouncing African names: pretend the first letter of the second name is the last letter of the first name. Often the first name ends in a vowel and the second name starts with a consonant. Example: Amara Mbanda-> pronounce like Amaram banda. Easy!

The suggestion it contains sounds you can't pronounce and so therefore you won't bother is completely unacceptable. It is a name and you need to figure out how to say it. Don't pretend you are showing respect by suggesting it is just too difficult to pronounce. That suggestion itself is effectively racist because it is ONLY African names that for some reason you can't manage. You can get 180 on the LSAT but you can't pronounce a simple name. No.

7Sage -this is not acceptable. This is the second time I have come across an African name that you are too racist and ignorant to even attempt to pronounce, yet you have made the effort to learn how to pronounce ridiculously long European names. This is seriously fucked up and you need to fix it. Shame on you.

never mind - more than the NW writers.

"more fully" ...more than what?

I still don't understand how to view ONLY the questions I got wrong. It seems like we have to view all the questions for one passage. Is there a way to view ONE question at a time (without trying to guess where in the vid it appears)?

What confuses me is the phrase, "given the info in the passage." I can't see how this is relevant to A (or the others for that matter). We could answer this question without the information in the passage at all -it's just what the study shows (if you assume the existance of airtime = accessible). Accessibility appears nowhere in the passage. In the test, I would have got confused and probably just guessed at random.

oh damn

If one group doesn't even believe in the LHB then how can they all agree on anything related to the LHB?

Could somebody please tell me how to find the search function? Thanks!

astronomy for athletes LOL

Thanks - I didn't realise all the questions from one passage were covered in the same video.

Does the lack of citations bother anyone else?