I can't even express how amazing 7Sage is. Without this, I would have NO chance on the LSAT. I just cannot believe how much effort has been put into this site. It is so well done. THANK YOU.

so far this method is looking amazing.

if opbjectivity is an "ideal" wouldn't that imply that few historians could achieve it? Or would rejecting answer A be an example of being aggressive in selecting answer choices?

This is sooo helpful!

For some stupid reason I often hit the check mark instead of the next arrow. I wish there was a way to get back to the passage after making that mistake. Instead I have to start all over again with another passage. Would it be possible to add a back button? Thanks.

Here's a helpful tip for pronouncing African names: pretend the first letter of the second name is the last letter of the first name. Often the first name ends in a vowel and the second name starts with a consonant. Example: Amara Mbanda-> pronounce like Amaram banda. Easy!

7Sage -this is not acceptable. This is the second time I have come across an African name that you are too racist and ignorant to even attempt to pronounce, yet you have made the effort to learn how to pronounce ridiculously long European names. This is seriously fucked up and you need to fix it. Shame on you.

"more fully" ...more than what?

I still don't understand how to view ONLY the questions I got wrong. It seems like we have to view all the questions for one passage. Is there a way to view ONE question at a time (without trying to guess where in the vid it appears)?

What confuses me is the phrase, "given the info in the passage." I can't see how this is relevant to A (or the others for that matter). We could answer this question without the information in the passage at all -it's just what the study shows (if you assume the existance of airtime = accessible). Accessibility appears nowhere in the passage. In the test, I would have got confused and probably just guessed at random.

If one group doesn't even believe in the LHB then how can they all agree on anything related to the LHB?

Could somebody please tell me how to find the search function? Thanks!

astronomy for athletes LOL

Does the lack of citations bother anyone else?

How do I view the explanations for these questions? It seems no matter what I click on, I don't get the explanation I am looking for. What do I click on? Thx.

It's ridiculous how easy I find it to answer questions based on this text, which contains familiar material, compared to the more technical texts that I can hardly understand. For those ones, I always need to go back to the passage to answer the questions -here I just know them.

In a real text, the author's voice and opinion would be obvious because those would be the sentences without citations. Here they have removed the citations deliberately to make it harder to find the author's voice.

This passage really shows me how much certain vocabulary makes me struggle. I can easily understand this passage (it's my discipline and topic) yet I really struggle with the more technical ones (ie. non social sciences). I think this demonstrates that I have let myself get distracted with the vocab, since if I can understand this one, I should be able to understand any of the passages -if I don't let the vocab get in my way. All this is to say, I need to focus more on the grammar and structure and less on unfamialiar words.

Corporations ARE persons. How to deal with statements that are factually wrong -do we accept what is in the passage as somebody's incorrect opinion, or accept the wrong thing as if it were true...what to do? Knowing corporations are persons, how do I understand the text after that incorrect statement?

I never read/listen to them. Too focused on actual studying.

How is E stronger than B? How could we know which is more likely to work?

Hey there are good bacteria too :)

in the made up E answer you assume the treatment happened before the less frequent snoring but that is not indicated in the sentence. No timeline in the sentence.

"it's like they want to keep their identity secret to prevent hate mail" -- like if they are women...sad but true.

I prefer the style of LR where the text under the video was the same; here there is a video PLUS a long and DIFFERENT text to read.