120 to 180 in 2 months is crazy

Only reason to elimate D over B is that passage A did not show any signs of being skeptical at all while the AC introduces an option that A might have been just less skeptical than B

go over a wrong answer journal and solidify your last weaknesses left

A was just too messy to pick since the professor is basing the whole argument on his own reasoning.

bro is just yapping for the first 10 minutes

how are these harder questions easier than the lower difficulty ones???

ANALOGY????

Props to the camera man for going back in time 4 billion years to get this footage for us

Only reason i didnt see D as being right is because you're only ruling out a small piece of evidence compared to A having multiple surveys.

So yall just forgot about Point at issue???

how is this one lower difficulty than the last one???

BOOM

funny how this passage used the concept of stealing thunder by providing negative information in the last paragraph.

"conform to the same principle embodied" = integrating new technology into your culture to improve it which is what B is

@1:30 Luigi Mangione prediction??

Got this right only cause all the other answer choices didnt make sense.

crying, spitting, throwing up.

I would say to generally answer questions within the time period and then blind review only the ones that you weren't fully sure of. Then see the wrong answers you got and know why your thought process or approach was wrong

its interesting how these types of questions are kind of like the logic games

#feedback number 19 is labeled as necessary assumption but the actual question it comes from is sufficient assumption.

so "Solely in" = "only in" for conditional indicators?

I was confident to choose C this time without reading D or E

idk how i got this right in the target time, every other answer choice just didnt make sense

bro yaps too much in these videos

I didn't end up choosing C because i though "all" was to strong to conclude about the passage