#question - Do you recommend doing a low res summary for each question for these drills to get used to doing them or is that unnecessary since we did a guided low res summary?
kevin makes rc sound so easy, but istg whenever i try to read and make a low res summary i panic about time and end up reading but not retaining any info 😭
Shouldn't the low-res summaries for paragraph 3 say something like "support for one of the first two perspectives?" Maybe I'm missing something but I thought that we didn't have reason to believe that the 3rd paragraph indicated support for one of the first two perspectives over another, just that it anti-supported the third perspective.
@Kevin_Lin I still think the written low res recap needs to be changed. Instead of support for the first perspective the third paragraph should be support for the first 2 hypotheses or just eliminates the 3rd perspective
12 comments
#question - Do you recommend doing a low res summary for each question for these drills to get used to doing them or is that unnecessary since we did a guided low res summary?
@OonaMilliken I think you should still make your own low-res as you read along with each paragraph. Then you can compare your breakdown to mine.
kevin makes rc sound so easy, but istg whenever i try to read and make a low res summary i panic about time and end up reading but not retaining any info 😭
@mzughaerr rt. I need kevin to just do the real lsat with me
So is answering the guiding Qs a separate step?
will there be a main point q and a summarize the passage q or one or the other cuz how can you do both at once?
We haven't gotten to all the passage style, but it seems to be whatever the author's opinion is?
"Qualified Support" is what I would guess lol.
Shouldn't the low-res summaries for paragraph 3 say something like "support for one of the first two perspectives?" Maybe I'm missing something but I thought that we didn't have reason to believe that the 3rd paragraph indicated support for one of the first two perspectives over another, just that it anti-supported the third perspective.
Yeah, I agree. Modified the text to reflect this. (The video already took your interpretation.)
@Kevin_Lin I still think the written low res recap needs to be changed. Instead of support for the first perspective the third paragraph should be support for the first 2 hypotheses or just eliminates the 3rd perspective
@JaredStein Thanks, will update! We updated for the old website, but looks like that change didn't go through to this one.