kevin makes rc sound so easy, but istg whenever i try to read and make a low res summary i panic about time and end up reading but not retaining any info ðŸ˜
Shouldn't the low-res summaries for paragraph 3 say something like "support for one of the first two perspectives?" Maybe I'm missing something but I thought that we didn't have reason to believe that the 3rd paragraph indicated support for one of the first two perspectives over another, just that it anti-supported the third perspective.
7
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
9 comments
kevin makes rc sound so easy, but istg whenever i try to read and make a low res summary i panic about time and end up reading but not retaining any info ðŸ˜
So is answering the guiding Qs a separate step?
will there be a main point q and a summarize the passage q or one or the other cuz how can you do both at once?
We haven't gotten to all the passage style, but it seems to be whatever the author's opinion is?
Shouldn't the low-res summaries for paragraph 3 say something like "support for one of the first two perspectives?" Maybe I'm missing something but I thought that we didn't have reason to believe that the 3rd paragraph indicated support for one of the first two perspectives over another, just that it anti-supported the third perspective.