Kevin's got a good sense of humor, confirmed.

Kevin you're crushing it, helpful to confirm/deny existing frameworks in my head. Tier 1.

"I got that from chatgpt by the way" man learning this fun who's gonna stop us.

Oh we are gonna do big things together on this test.

lets goo.

KEVIN & the whole squad rock.

"this is not a copyright problem, this is a 'you suck at writing problem'," -absolute gold.

If

A most B

B -> C

Then obvi: A most C

Question; is it also valid then to conclude

A some C

C some A

Thanks

Whoever is studying and reading this keep crushing it.

Stick with it you owe it to yourself.

over and outttieeee.

Some bare minimum is 1 but is upper limit just under 50%

Inclusive OR most common the test because it has the most interpretations to play with. Oye vey, hope everyone's studying is going smoothhhhh.

Happy Friday!

SPOILERS:

SA screams at you:

"ONLY IF" huge green flag on this question.

Excellent instructor.

No matter how you slice it, if you do the split approach diligently you save time and can bank it elsewhere. BLESS YOU FAM.

Could you pick E while still blind to Passage B on the idea that E is more strongly supported throughout the passage whereas the reference to judges was only in graph 3?

all but C were touched on in passage A. Split method is powerful if used proper.

Kev thats good juju don't listen to the haterzz.

Tone shift at the end, thats the difference. Guessing a question or two will speak to that, trip us up with language that goes too far in authors support. Woof.

I would indeed expect the moon to be peppered with all kinds of crater's.

Anyone else having fun with this stuff or is it just me?