I have been honing in on MSS question types, as they are one of my LR weaknesses, and I wanted to share some takeaways I've developed:
describing an instance of a situation in the stimulus does not mean you can infer in the answer choices that this situation happens often (unless the stimulus explicitly says so).
if the stimulus does not use comparative language, the correct answer choice will not use comparative language
similarly, if the stimulus does not use superlative language (e.g., X is the best/most effective method), the correct answer choice will not do so either
do NOT make broad inferences or generalizations. ex: if the stimulus says something happens often during a process, don't select an answer choice that says it invariably happens during a process.
don't assume the stimulus is asking about the author's statements. it could be asking about others' claims that are presented in the stimulus, so make sure to read it
random but saying X is directly proportional to Y in the stimulus means that if X increases, Y increases and vice versa (your fellow not-so-math girlie got a question wrong because she didn't know this)
feel free to comment if you have any corrections to what I wrote or additional takeaways!
5 comments
i literally wrote the same "directional proportional" in my notes too because i got it wrong for the same reason lol !!
Hi, do you have something like this for other question types?
This was very helpful. I’m struggling here. 😁
@8M_M8 Glad to hear it's helpful! I did do one for weaken questions recently. I'll tag you in it. I am targeting Must Be True questions next, so I'll develop some key takeaways for that.
Is there a specific LR type you are struggling with? I can share some takeaways/suggestions if it is one I feel good about.
this is great!!!
@sxphs thanks so much! 😊