- Joined
- Aug 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
i hate overthinking i went straight to conditional relationship instead of fact v belief
pretty much what you’ve said here but in an addenda and with a bit more detail
i don't like the jump from something being fashionable to something being more expensive. i do not think that is an adequate explanation on any account by lsac
at first i didn't understand A but i think its saying that encountering the situation itself is what causes the heartrate to rise, not inhibiting the emotion.
force urself to read every answer before you start eliminating any / check one off as correct
can we actually assume that with c, it won’t rise above the over 65 crowd? i understand that the argument says over 65 will soon have greater discretionary income but i thought the answer implied that young adults will potentially rise back up above them.
i understand that b is the stronger answer, but i wanted to clarify this!
thought this question was the hardest thing ever and it’s just because i read the stimulus wrong lol
hi! this might be kinda goofy but i would love a drill option that eliminates questions that have any diagramming / likely require written work cuz i like to drill while im on my transit to work and i dont have scratch paper to diagram conditionals or formal logic when doing that. i know i could technically probably do that myself in settings but it would be great to just have like a ‘i’m on a bus’ option when clicking adaptive drills LOL. just sharing an idea!
would C be a necessary assumption for the argument? i initially thought this but after reviewing and understanding the question, i am not sure if that is true anymore LOL
lowkey the author never mentions lawyers and idk who tfbentham is but the article overall felt critical so i went with that yay
this is great!!!