- Joined
- Nov 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
More traffic makes cars drive slower, which will cause less fatalities. This is more reasonable than E, we have no reason to assume this year will be different than last year.
Why isnt A correct, it has 2 flaws. The first, that people who live there are on average smarter, not just born there. The second, just cause on average they're smarter doesn't mean every individual is smarter. This second flaw is whole-to-part flaw, why isn't this correct?
How can we assume that there's only instinctual and flexible? Maybe there's a third type.
This has a important answer to remember. The answer isn't sufficient to validate the argument, but it is necessary.
I would assume it's ai. You can probably build these games pretty quickly with claude by yourself.
You need to realize that the seeds need sunlight to germinate and not just light (moonlight for example). If the seeds germinated with any light, then even if they were plowed at night they would still be exposed to some (non sun)light. If that's true, then b would be correct, not plowing wouldn't expose it to any light, while plowing would expose the seeds to some light.
The statistician us actually making a flaw. If we have 1 study with 1000 people and another with 1100, can't we just combine the results. So it's as f there was a study with 2100 people.
I got it right without understanding a word of it. I figured the argument had a premise but was missing a conditional statement for the premise to do anything. E was the only answer that was a conditional statement, so it was the only answer choice that had the possibility of working.
I think the main thing is to understand the concepts, that conditions go in one direction and not the other. For some hard conditional reasoning questions you will need to map it out though, especially in match the argument questions.
Dostoyevsky says you need to be a good artist to achieve your goals. This doesn't mean that you aren't a good artist that your art cannot unintentionally represent perspective. Because maybe you tried to serve one political veiw, but with bad writing served a different one. Therefore (a) isnt good, because even a bad artist can unintentionally serve a certain political view.
Is B saying that alchemy is so removed from from chemistry that it's not chemistrys origin?
If E would've said "complex" instead of "sophisticated", would it be correct? Generally the main point is in the last paragraph, not first.
Is there a set numbers of questions that you're supposed to do for a drill? I usually do a bunch of 5-10 question drills but I've seen people say you should be doing 25 for each drill.
The passage says nothing can be refunded of the purchase price. But they don't say if they can be refunded halfway. Therefore (D) is wrong, gardening tools can be refunded, just not a full refund?
#help
This is such a flawed argument. It assumes just cause people believe most of the budget is going towards counseling, it is. It also assumes that most of the budget shouldn't go towards counseling.
I read terry, decided it was a necessary sufficient flaw, skipped pat, and then searched for this flaw. I got it over a minute under target time. 😁
The use of the medication only contributes to the development of a worse chicken pox. Not necessarily is this a direct side effect.